Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
ONEQ vs URTH: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, ONEQ returned +12.7% to URTH's +13.1%; 41% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about ONEQ and URTH
Net assets: $10.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF, and $8.9bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares MSCI World ETF.
Pair scorecard
ONEQ costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.4 points; ONEQ is 1.3 times larger.
| Measure | ONEQ | URTH |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +12.7% | +13.1% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 3.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Nasdaq Composite Index | MSCI World Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.21% | 0.24% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $10.9bn | $8.2bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 41% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 56.0% | 27.2% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, ONEQ and URTH hold 41% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
41% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
ONEQ and URTH on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ONEQ
ONEQ tracks the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,026 positions, with the top ten at 56.0%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
URTH
URTH tracks the MSCI World. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI All Country World Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 69% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,254 positions, with the top ten at 27.2%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ONEQ or URTH?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ONEQ returned +12.7% and URTH +13.1%.
- Which is cheaper, ONEQ or URTH?
- ONEQ is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. That is about $3 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ONEQ against URTH, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/oneq-vs-urth
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). ONEQ against URTH. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/oneq-vs-urth
[ONEQ against URTH (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/oneq-vs-urth)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.