Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
ONEQ vs URTH: how they differ
ONEQ and URTH hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and ONEQ returned more over the year.
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF and iShares MSCI World ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ONEQ and URTH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in ONEQ | Only in URTH |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP 11.24% | NVIDIA 5.52% |
| APPLE INC 10.04% | APPLE 5.28% |
| MICROSOFT CORP 7.32% | MICROSOFT 3.82% |
| AMAZON.COM INC 6.37% | AMAZON.COM INC 2.67% |
| ALPHABET INC 4.85% | ALPHABET CLASS A 2.14% |
| BROADCOM INC 4.64% | BROADCOM INC 1.79% |
| ALPHABET INC 4.48% | ALPHABET CLASS C 1.70% |
| TESLA INC 3.58% | META PLATFORMS CLASS A 1.56% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.
| ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF | URTH iShares MSCI World ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Fidelity | iShares |
| What it is | Nasdaq Composite | MSCI World |
| Total return, 1 year | +20.6% | +17.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | +3.1 pts | −0.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.21% | 0.24% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 87.4% | 70.3% |
| Holdings | 1022 | 1230 |
ONEQ in plain words
ONEQ is an index equity fund tracking the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1022 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%.
URTH in plain words
URTH is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI World. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 70% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1230 positions, with the top ten at 26.8%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ONEQ or URTH?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ONEQ returned +20.6% and URTH returned +17.4%, so ONEQ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, ONEQ or URTH?
- ONEQ charges 0.21% a year and URTH charges 0.24%, so ONEQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do ONEQ and URTH overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 87% of ONEQ and 70% of URTH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ONEQ against URTH, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/oneq-vs-urth Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources