ONEQ vs PABU: Differences, Returns & Fees
ONEQ and PABU hold 47% of their weight in the same names, and ONEQ returned +16.3% over the year. Net assets: $10.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF, and $2.5bn on Oct 20, 2026 for iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF.
PABU costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.1 points; ONEQ is 4.4 times larger.
| ONEQ | PABU | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.21% | 0.10% |
| Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026 | $10.9bn | $2.5bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +16.3% | +10.2% |
| What it tracks | Nasdaq Composite Index | MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned Benchmark Extended Select Index |
| Holdings in common | 47% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 57.6% | 48.9% |
| Below its high | 4.3%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ONEQ and PABU hold 47% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
half
47% in common
On the same fields
ONEQ and PABU on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About ONEQ
ONEQ tracks the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +16.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,021 positions, with the top ten at 57.6%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
About PABU
PABU tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +10.2% with distributions reinvested, against +15.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 88 positions, with the top ten at 48.9%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ONEQ or PABU?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ONEQ returned +16.3% and PABU +10.2%.
- Which is cheaper, ONEQ or PABU?
- PABU is cheaper, by 0.11 percentage points a year. That is about $11 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ONEQ against PABU, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/oneq-vs-pabu
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). ONEQ against PABU. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/oneq-vs-pabu
[ONEQ against PABU (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/oneq-vs-pabu)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.