MDYV vs VOE: how they differ

MDYV and VOE hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and VOE returned +19.3% over the year. State Street SPDR S & P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF and Vanguard Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF.

VOE costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.9 points; VOE is 8.4 times larger.

MDYVVOE
Expense ratio0.15%0.05%
Net assets, MDYV as of Oct 8, 2026 and VOE as of Sep 30, 2026$2.7bn$22.8bn
Total return, 1 year+10.4%+19.3%
Holdings in common1%
Nasdaq-100, total return, 1 year+23.6%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund11.0%13.9%
Below its high7.1%, high on Aug 14, 20263.7%, high on Aug 14, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+10.4%
MDYV total return, 1 year
+19.3%
VOE total return, 1 year
0.15%
MDYV expense ratio
0.05%
VOE expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MDYV and VOE hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

half

1% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding MDYV VOE
CORTEVA INC 0.56% 0.94%
Only in MDYV
TD SYNNEX CORP 1.30%
US FOODS HOLDING CORP 1.27%
RELIANCE INC 1.23%
PERMIAN RESOURCES CORP CL A 1.16%
HF SINCLAIR CORP 1.13%
OVINTIV INC 1.06%
WESCO INTERNATIONAL INC 1.05%
REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA 1.01%
Only in VOE
Marathon Petroleum Corp 1.80%
Valero Energy Corp 1.76%
Phillips 66 1.64%
SLB Ltd 1.49%
Cummins Inc 1.29%
General Motors Co 1.29%
Target Corp 1.21%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co 1.15%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

MDYV
State Street SPDR S & P 400 Mid Cap Value ETF
VOE
Vanguard Morningstar Mid-Cap Value ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index of Mid-Cap Value
Total return, 1 year +10.4% +19.3%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 −6.9 pts +2.1 pts
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.05%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 96.0%
Holdings 296 170
Net assets, MDYV as of Oct 8, 2026 and VOE as of Sep 30, 2026 $2.7bn $22.8bn

MDYV and VOE on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

MDYV in plain words

MDYV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +10.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 296 positions, with the top ten at 11.0%. It sat 7.1% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

VOE in plain words

VOE tracks an index of Mid-Cap Value. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500 and +23.6% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Aug 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 170 positions, with the top ten at 13.9%. It sat 3.7% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MDYV or VOE?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MDYV returned +10.4% and VOE +19.3%.
Which is cheaper, MDYV or VOE?
VOE is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. On $10,000 held for a year that difference is about $10. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MDYV and VOE overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of MDYV and 96% of VOE by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, MDYV against VOE, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mdyv-vs-voe

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.