XBI vs XME: which is really different?
XBI and XME hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and XBI returned +45.0% over the year. State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Biotech ETF and State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Metals & Mining ETF.
Both cost 0.35% a year; their one-year returns differ by 40.8 points; XBI is 2.4 times larger.
| XBI | XME | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.35% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 | $9.9bn | $4.1bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +45.0% | +4.2% |
| What it tracks | Biotech | Miners and metals |
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| S&P 500, total return, 1 year | +17.3% | |
| Against the S&P 500, 1 year | ahead by 27.7 pts | behind by 13.0 pts |
| Below its all-time high | 11.1%, high on Feb 8, 2021 | 19.8%, high on Jun 2, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.
13% of XBI's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 87% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.
20% of XME's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 80% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.
A percentile among the 391 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, XBI and XME hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.
half
0% in common
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | XBI | XME | XBI | XME | XBI | XME |
| 3 months | −3.3% | +2.6% | −6.7 pts | −0.8 pts | −7.0 pts | −1.0 pts |
| 6 months | +18.9% | −6.2% | +3.8 pts | −21.4 pts | −4.3 pts | −29.4 pts |
| 1 year | +45.0% | +4.2% | +27.7 pts | −13.0 pts | +21.4 pts | −19.4 pts |
| 3 years | +114.6% | +107.5% | +28.8 pts | +21.7 pts | +7.3 pts | +0.2 pts |
| Since launch XBI Feb 2006 · XME Jun 2006 | +890.7% | +204.2% | +92.2 pts | −602.0 pts | −1,164.7 pts | −1,995.8 pts |
Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
As of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
XBI in plain words
By weight, 13% of XBI's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 17% of the fund across 165 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 the fund returned +45.0% with distributions reinvested against +17.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 27.7 pts. It sits 11.1% below its all-time high of Feb 8, 2021.
XME in plain words
By weight, 20% of XME's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 51% of the fund across 38 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 the fund returned +4.2% with distributions reinvested against +17.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 13.0 pts. It sits 19.8% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do XBI and XME hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation.
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
ETFIQ, XBI against XME, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/xbi-vs-xme
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). XBI against XME. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/xbi-vs-xme
[XBI against XME (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/xbi-vs-xme)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.