NFRA vs RIFR: which is really different?
RIFR holds 57.3% of its weight in S&P 500 companies and NFRA 35.8%. Northern Trust STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure ETF and Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF.
NFRA costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.6 points; NFRA is far larger, $3.0bn against $43m.
| NFRA | RIFR | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.47% | 0.59% |
| Net assets, NFRA as of Jul 31, 2026 and RIFR as of Jun 30, 2026 | $3.0bn | $43m |
| Total return, 1 year | +5.5% | +6.1% |
| What it tracks | Infrastructure | Infrastructure |
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| S&P 500, total return, 1 year | +17.3% | |
| Against the S&P 500, 1 year | behind by 11.7 pts | behind by 11.1 pts |
| Below its all-time high | 5.5%, high on Feb 27, 2026 | 6.3%, high on Feb 27, 2026 |
36% of NFRA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 64% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.
57% of RIFR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 43% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.
A percentile among the 391 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →
Performance, window by window
| Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | NFRA | RIFR | NFRA | RIFR | NFRA | RIFR |
| 3 months | −3.7% | −5.3% | −7.1 pts | −8.7 pts | −7.4 pts | −9.0 pts |
| 6 months | −2.5% | −5.3% | −17.7 pts | −20.5 pts | −25.7 pts | −28.5 pts |
| 1 year | +5.5% | +6.1% | −11.7 pts | −11.1 pts | −18.1 pts | −17.5 pts |
| 3 years | +45.2% | not published | −40.6 pts | not published | −62.1 pts | not published |
| Since launch NFRA Oct 2013 · RIFR May 2025 | +127.4% | +13.9% | −358.0 pts | −20.8 pts | −857.4 pts | −32.0 pts |
Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
As of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
NFRA in plain words
By weight, 36% of NFRA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 96%. The top ten holdings are 29% of the fund across 179 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 the fund returned +5.5% with distributions reinvested against +17.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 11.7 pts. It sits 5.5% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
RIFR in plain words
By weight, 57% of RIFR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 38% of the fund across 61 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 the fund returned +6.1% with distributions reinvested against +17.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 11.1 pts. It sits 6.3% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation.
Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
ETFIQ, NFRA against RIFR, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/nfra-vs-rifr
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). NFRA against RIFR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/nfra-vs-rifr
[NFRA against RIFR (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/nfra-vs-rifr)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.