GII vs NFRA: which is really different?
GII and NFRA hold 27% of their weight in the same names. State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Global Infrastructure ETF and Northern Trust STOXX Global Broad Infrastructure ETF.
GII costs 0.07 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.4 points; NFRA is 3.3 times larger.
| GII | NFRA | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.40% | 0.47% |
| Net assets, GII as of Oct 8, 2026 and NFRA as of Jul 31, 2026 | $911m | $3.0bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +5.1% | +5.5% |
| What it tracks | Infrastructure | Infrastructure |
| Holdings in common | 27% | |
| S&P 500, total return, 1 year | +17.3% | |
| Against the S&P 500, 1 year | behind by 12.2 pts | behind by 11.7 pts |
| Below its all-time high | 8.5%, high on Feb 27, 2026 | 5.5%, high on Feb 27, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.
35% of GII's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 65% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.
36% of NFRA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 64% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.
A percentile among the 391 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, GII and NFRA hold 27% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.
half
27% in common
27% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | GII | NFRA | GII | NFRA | GII | NFRA |
| 3 months | −6.2% | −3.7% | −9.6 pts | −7.1 pts | −9.9 pts | −7.4 pts |
| 6 months | −7.6% | −2.5% | −22.8 pts | −17.7 pts | −30.8 pts | −25.7 pts |
| 1 year | +5.1% | +5.5% | −12.2 pts | −11.7 pts | −18.5 pts | −18.1 pts |
| 3 years | +61.5% | +45.2% | −24.3 pts | −40.6 pts | −45.8 pts | −62.1 pts |
| Since launch GII Jan 2007 · NFRA Oct 2013 | +168.3% | +127.4% | −508.6 pts | −358.0 pts | −1,721.3 pts | −857.4 pts |
Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
As of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GII in plain words
By weight, 35% of GII's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 38% of the fund across 77 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 the fund returned +5.1% with distributions reinvested against +17.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 12.2 pts. It sits 8.5% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
NFRA in plain words
By weight, 36% of NFRA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 96%. The top ten holdings are 29% of the fund across 179 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 the fund returned +5.5% with distributions reinvested against +17.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 11.7 pts. It sits 5.5% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do GII and NFRA hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 27% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is a meaningful overlap. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation.
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
ETFIQ, GII against NFRA, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/gii-vs-nfra
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). GII against NFRA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/gii-vs-nfra
[GII against NFRA (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/gii-vs-nfra)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.