Do LGHT and THNR hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, LGHT or THNR?

LGHT has 70% of its weight in S&P 500 names and THNR has 40%, so LGHT differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, LGHT or THNR?

LGHT charges 0.85% a year and THNR charges 0.59%, so THNR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Open live

LGHT vs THNR: which is really different?

LGHT and THNR hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and THNR returned +9.2% over the year. Langar Global HealthTech ETF and Amplify Weight Loss Drug & Treatment ETF.

69.6%

LGHT in the S&P 500

39.5%

THNR in the S&P 500

+4.0%

LGHT total return, 1 year

+9.2%

THNR total return, 1 year

LGHT · 1 year to Sep 30, 202630% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

70% of LGHT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 30% is outside the index

THNR · 1 year to Sep 30, 202661% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

40% of THNR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 61% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · LGHT scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?

LGHT 69.7

THNR 37.7

0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, LGHT and THNR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 1, 2026.

50%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding LGHT THNR

Only in LGHT

Intuitive Surgical I 11.93%

ResMed Inc 10.95%

Moderna Inc 9.59%

Veeva Systems Inc 6.73%

GE HealthCare 6.50%

IQVIA Holdings Inc 5.99%

Koninklijke Philips 5.55%

Insulet Corp 5.34%

Only in THNR

Eli Lilly & Co 10.07%

Novo Nordisk A/S 8.42%

CSPC Pharmaceutical Group Ltd 5.82%

Amgen Inc 5.75%

Pfizer Inc 5.38%

Innovent Biologics Inc 5.30%

AstraZeneca PLC 5.27%

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc 4.64%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		vs the S&P 500		vs the Nasdaq-100
Window	LGHT	THNR	LGHT	THNR	LGHT	THNR
3 months	+20.1%	−1.8%	+17.6 pts	−4.3 pts	+18.0 pts	−3.9 pts
6 months	+20.3%	+0.7%	+3.4 pts	−16.3 pts	−6.5 pts	−26.1 pts
1 year	+4.0%	+9.2%	−11.8 pts	−6.5 pts	−19.8 pts	−14.6 pts
Since launch LGHT Jan 2024 · THNR May 2024	+2.8%	+1.6%	−62.5 pts	−46.1 pts	−80.9 pts	−62.8 pts

LGHT and THNR over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

LGHT

Langar Global HealthTech ETF · Holds 28 stocks in healthcare innovation and GLP-1, 70% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

THNR

Amplify Weight Loss Drug & Treatment ETF · Holds 22 stocks in healthcare innovation and GLP-1, 40% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Langar Amplify

Theme Healthcare innovation and GLP-1 Healthcare innovation and GLP-1

In the S&P 500 69.6% 39.5%

Active share vs the S&P 500 99.5% 96.5%

In the Nasdaq-100 23.2% 14.9%

Holdings 28 22

Top ten, share of the fund 71.9% 59.8%

Expense ratio 0.85% 0.59%

Fee for the differing part 0.85% 0.61%

Total return, 1 year +4.0% +9.2%

vs the S&P 500 −11.8 pts −6.5 pts

vs the Nasdaq-100 −19.8 pts −14.6 pts

Below its high −5.9% −9.9%

Net assets $2m $6m

LGHT and THNR on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

LGHT in plain words

By weight, 70% of LGHT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 72% of the fund across 28 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +4.0% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 11.8 pts. It sits 5.9% below its all-time high of Jan 30, 2025.

THNR in plain words

By weight, 40% of THNR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 96%. The top ten holdings are 60% of the fund across 22 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 1, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +9.2% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 6.5 pts. It sits 9.9% below its all-time high of Aug 25, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do LGHT and THNR hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, LGHT or THNR?: LGHT has 70% of its weight in S&P 500 names and THNR has 40%, so LGHT differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, LGHT or THNR?: LGHT charges 0.85% a year and THNR charges 0.59%, so THNR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

LGHT vs OZEM LGHT vs BMED LGHT vs EKG LGHT vs WDNA THNR vs BMED THNR vs EKG THNR vs HEAL THNR vs WDNA

LGHT on its own →THNR on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

LGHT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗LGHT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Langar website ↗THNR filings on SEC EDGAR ↗THNR prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Amplify page for THNR ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, LGHT against THNR, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/lght-vs-thnr

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.