Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

EIPI vs MLPD: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year MLPD paid 13.3% of its price in cash against EIPI’s 7.6%, though EIPI returned more with it reinvested.

FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF.

7.6%EIPI cash paid, 1 year
13.3%MLPD cash paid, 1 year
+21.1%EIPI total return, 1 year
+12.0%MLPD total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: EIPI scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

EIPI 47.4MLPD 24.33.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

EIPI26.8 pts behind XLE · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
XLE+47.8%EIPI+21.1%7.6% as cash26.8 pts behind XLETotal return, distributions reinvestedXLE+47.8%EIPI+21.1%26.8 pts behind XLE
MLPD35.8 pts behind XLE · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
XLE+47.8%MLPD+12.0%13.3% as cash35.8 pts behind XLETotal return, distributions reinvestedXLE+47.8%MLPD+12.0%35.8 pts behind XLE

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, EIPI and MLPD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in EIPIOnly in MLPD
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. 8.76%GLOBAL X MLP & ENERGY INFRAS 102.10%
Energy Transfer LP 6.86%CASH 1.05%
MPLX LP 4.67%OTHER PAYABLE & RECEIVABLES -1.02%
Kinder Morgan, Inc. 3.88%2MLPX US 10/16/2026 C74 -2.13%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. 3.50%
ONEOK, Inc. 3.12%
US Dollar 2.97%
Shell plc (ADR) 2.90%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

EIPI and MLPD over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
EIPIMLPDEIPIMLPDEIPIMLPD
3 months+5.1%+4.2%1.7%3.0%−15.4 pts−16.2 pts
6 months+4.1%+4.1%3.4%5.7%−5.8 pts−5.8 pts
1 year+21.1%+12.0%7.6%13.3%−26.8 pts−35.8 pts
Since launch+49.1%+33.5%22.6%28.2%+1.2 pts−14.7 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
EIPI and MLPD on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
EIPI
FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF
Covered call on XLE, paying monthly
MLPD
Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure Covered Call ETF
Covered call on XLE, paying monthly
IssuerFirst TrustGlobal X
Strategycovered callcovered call
BenchmarkEnergy sector (XLE), used as the energy proxyEnergy sector (XLE), used as the energy proxy
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized6.7%12.0%
Expense ratio1.11%0.60%
Cash paid, 1 year7.6%13.3%
Price change, 1 year+12.8%−2.1%
Total return, 1 year+21.1%+12.0%
Benchmark return, 1 year+47.8%+47.8%
Ahead or behind−26.8 pts−35.8 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published0%
Age865 days863 days
Net assets$1.1bn$27m

EIPI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, EIPI paid 7.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 12.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.1%. Energy sector (XLE), used as the energy proxy returned +47.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 26.8 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.7%, paid monthly.

MLPD in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, MLPD paid 13.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +12.0%. Energy sector (XLE), used as the energy proxy returned +47.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 35.8 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.0%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, EIPI or MLPD?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, EIPI paid 7.6% of its starting price in cash and MLPD paid 13.3%, so MLPD paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, EIPI or MLPD?
With every distribution reinvested, EIPI returned +21.1% and MLPD returned +12.0% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so EIPI returned more.
Which is cheaper, EIPI or MLPD?
EIPI charges 1.11% a year and MLPD charges 0.60%, so MLPD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

EIPI against MLPD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, EIPI against MLPD, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/eipi-vs-mlpd Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources