Data as of .
EIPI vs FINY: which paid, and which earned it?
EIPI and FINY both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, EIPI and FINY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in EIPI | Only in FINY |
|---|---|
| Enterprise Products Partners L.P. 8.76% | Treasury Bill 100.00% |
| Energy Transfer LP 6.86% | |
| MPLX LP 4.67% | |
| Kinder Morgan, Inc. 3.88% | |
| ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. 3.50% | |
| ONEOK, Inc. 3.12% | |
| US Dollar 2.97% | |
| Shell plc (ADR) 2.90% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EIPI | FINY | EIPI | FINY | EIPI | FINY | |
| 3 months | +5.1% | +5.0% | 1.7% | 4.2% | −15.4 pts | +0.4 pts |
| 6 months | +4.1% | not published | 3.4% | not published | −5.8 pts | not published |
| 1 year | +21.1% | not published | 7.6% | not published | −26.8 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +49.1% | +9.2% | 22.6% | 7.7% | +1.2 pts | +0.6 pts |
| EIPI FT Energy Income Partners Enhanced Income ETF Covered call on XLE, paying monthly | FINY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Financials ETF Synthetic covered call on XLF, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | First Trust | GraniteShares |
| Strategy | covered call | synthetic covered call |
| Benchmark | Energy sector (XLE), used as the energy proxy | Financials sector (XLF) |
| Pays | monthly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 6.7% | 11.2% |
| Expense ratio | 1.11% | 1.07% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 7.6% | 7.7% (since launch on May 5, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | +12.8% | +1.2% |
| Total return, 1 year | +21.1% | +9.2% (since launch on May 5, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +47.8% | +8.7% |
| Ahead or behind | −26.8 pts | +0.6 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 96% |
| Age | 865 days | 136 days |
| Net assets | $1.1bn | $761,337 |
EIPI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, EIPI paid 7.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 12.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.1%. Energy sector (XLE), used as the energy proxy returned +47.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 26.8 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.7%, paid monthly.
FINY in plain words
Over the period since launch on May 5, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, FINY paid 7.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +9.2%. Financials sector (XLF) returned +8.7% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 0.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 11.2%, paid weekly. GraniteShares estimates that 96% of the distribution paid Jul 7, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, EIPI or FINY?
- EIPI charges 1.11% a year and FINY charges 1.07%, so FINY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, EIPI against FINY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/eipi-vs-finy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.