ACRT vs JANQ: which paid, and which earned it?

ACRT and JANQ both write options for income. ProShares Russell 2000 Autocallable Income ETF and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - January.

0.0%
ACRT cash paid, since launch
0.0%
JANQ cash paid, since launch
−8.7%
ACRT total return, since launch
0.0%
JANQ total return, since launch
ACRT · since launch to Sep 30, 2026About even with IWM
ACRT
−8.7%
IWM
−8.7%

About even with IWM

ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.

IWM

−8.7%

ACRT

−8.7%

about even with IWM

Total return, distributions reinvested

About even with IWM

ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.

IWM

−8.7%

ACRT

−8.7%

about even with IWM

0.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.

JANQ · since launch to Sep 30, 20260.9 pts behind SPY
JANQ
0.0%
SPY
+0.9%

0.9 pts behind SPY

JANQ since launch: paid 0.0%, price 0.0%, total 0.0%, SPY +0.9%, −0.9 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

JANQ

0.0%

0.9 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

0.9 pts behind SPY

JANQ since launch: paid 0.0%, price 0.0%, total 0.0%, SPY +0.9%, −0.9 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

JANQ

0.0%

0.9 pts behind SPY

0.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +0.9%. JANQ since launch: paid 0.0%, price 0.0%, total 0.0%, SPY +0.9%, −0.9 pts.

Performance, window by window

Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowACRTJANQACRTJANQACRTJANQ
Since launch
ACRT Aug 2026 · JANQ Sep 2026
−8.7%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0 pts−0.9 pts

ACRT and JANQ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

ACRT
ProShares Russell 2000 Autocallable Income ETF · Autocallable on IWM
JANQ
Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - January · Defined income on SPY
Issuer ProShares Innovator
Strategy autocallable defined income
Benchmark Russell 2000 (IWM) S&P 500 (SPY)
Pays not established not established
Payout rate, annualized not published not published
Expense ratio 0.72% 0.79%
Cash paid, 1 year 0.0% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) 0.0% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026)
Price change, 1 year −8.7% 0.0%
Total return, 1 year −8.7% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) 0.0% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year −8.7% +0.9%
Ahead or behind 0.0 pts −0.9 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate not published not published
Age 47 days 20 days
Net assets $1m not published

ACRT and JANQ on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ACRT in plain words

Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACRT paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −8.7%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned −8.7% over the same days, so a holder was about even.

JANQ in plain words

Over the period since launch on Sep 10, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, JANQ paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned 0.0%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +0.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.9 pts.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACRT or JANQ?
ACRT charges 0.72% a year and JANQ charges 0.79%, so ACRT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, ACRT against JANQ, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-janq

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.