Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SDY vs XLF: how they differ

SDY and XLF hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and SDY returned more over the year.

State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF and State Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SDY and XLF hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SDY and XLF both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSDYXLF
TRAVELERS COS INC/THE0.66%0.97%
AFLAC INC0.85%0.65%
AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL INC0.69%0.62%
CHUBB LTD0.52%1.52%
S+P GLOBAL INC0.40%1.55%
CINCINNATI FINANCIAL CORP0.85%0.33%
T ROWE PRICE GROUP INC0.98%0.29%
WR BERKLEY CORP0.24%0.26%
BROWN + BROWN INC0.46%0.24%
ASSURANT INC0.59%0.17%
GLOBE LIFE INC0.30%0.17%
JACK HENRY + ASSOCIATES INC0.47%0.14%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SDYOnly in XLF
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC 3.33%JPMORGAN CHASE + CO 11.81%
ACCENTURE PLC CL A 2.94%BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CL B 11.59%
REALTY INCOME CORP 2.12%VISA INC CLASS A SHARES 7.60%
CHEVRON CORP 2.09%MASTERCARD INC A 5.69%
PEPSICO INC 1.95%BANK OF AMERICA CORP 5.09%
MEDTRONIC PLC 1.82%GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC 3.75%
TARGET CORP 1.74%WELLS FARGO + CO 3.41%
NIKE INC CL B 1.53%MORGAN STANLEY 3.18%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

SDY and XLF on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SDY
State Street(R) SPDR(R) S&P(R) Dividend ETF
XLF
State Street(R) Financial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerState StreetState Street
What it isSPDR S&P DividendFinancials
Total return, 1 year+11.0%+7.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−6.5 pts−9.9 pts
Expense ratio0.35%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50084.6%100.0%
Holdings15779

SDY in plain words

SDY is an index equity fund tracking the SPDR S&P Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 157 positions, with the top ten at 20.5%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLF in plain words

XLF is an index equity fund tracking the Financials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 79 positions, with the top ten at 57.3%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SDY or XLF?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SDY returned +11.0% and XLF returned +7.6%, so SDY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SDY or XLF?
SDY charges 0.35% a year and XLF charges 0.08%, so XLF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SDY and XLF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 85% of SDY and 100% of XLF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SDY against XLF, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SDY against XLF, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/sdy-vs-xlf Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources