Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

PFF vs URTH: how they differ

PFF and URTH hold 27% of their weight in the same names, and URTH returned more over the year.

iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF and iShares MSCI World ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, PFF and URTH hold 27% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions PFF and URTH both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingPFFURTH
ALPHABET INC2.24%2.14%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO0.32%1.04%
ORACLE CORPORATION2.31%0.29%
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY0.28%0.30%
CITIGROUP INC0.37%0.26%
AT&T INC0.41%0.20%
CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION (THE)0.19%0.20%
NEXTERA ENERGY CAPITAL HOLDINGS IN0.26%0.19%
MORGAN STANLEY0.18%0.28%
BOEING CO3.54%0.17%
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP/THE0.24%0.12%
US BANCORP0.13%0.11%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in PFFOnly in URTH
ALBEMARLE CORP 1.12%NVIDIA 5.52%
BRIGHTSPRING HEALTH SERVICES UNITS 0.74%APPLE 5.28%
NEXTERA ENERGY UNITS 0.70%MICROSOFT 3.82%
BRUKER CORPORATION 0.53%AMAZON.COM INC 2.67%
STRIVE INC 0.38%BROADCOM INC 1.79%
NOVANTA TANGIBLE EQUITY UNITS 0.37%ALPHABET CLASS C 1.70%
REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA INCOR 0.35%META PLATFORMS CLASS A 1.56%
AEGON FUNDING CORPORATION II 0.32%MICRON TECHNOLOGY 1.21%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

PFF and URTH on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
PFF
iShares Preferred and Income Securities ETF
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssueriSharesiShares
What it isPreferred and Income SecuritiesMSCI World
Total return, 1 year−0.8%+17.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−18.3 pts−0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.45%0.24%
Already in the S&P 50021.6%70.3%
Holdings4611230

PFF in plain words

PFF is an index equity fund tracking the Preferred and Income Securities. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.45% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 461 positions, with the top ten at 23.1%. It sat 3.2% below its high of May 8, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

URTH in plain words

URTH is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI World. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 70% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1230 positions, with the top ten at 26.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, PFF or URTH?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, PFF returned −0.8% and URTH returned +17.4%, so URTH returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, PFF or URTH?
PFF charges 0.45% a year and URTH charges 0.24%, so URTH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do PFF and URTH overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 22% of PFF and 70% of URTH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 27% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

PFF against URTH, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, PFF against URTH, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/pff-vs-urth Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources