Which returned more over the last year, IGSB or URTH?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IGSB returned +1.7% and URTH returned +17.4%, so URTH returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, IGSB or URTH?

IGSB charges 0.04% a year and URTH charges 0.24%, so IGSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

IGSB vs URTH: how they differ

IGSB and URTH hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and URTH returned more over the year.

iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF and iShares MSCI World ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IGSB and URTH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in IGSB	Only in URTH
BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 0.56%	NVIDIA 5.52%
EAGLE FUNDING LUXCO S. R.L. 144A 0.29%	APPLE 5.28%
SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES COR 144A 0.15%	MICROSOFT 3.82%
DEUTSCHE TELEKOM INTERNATIONAL FIN 0.10%	AMAZON.COM INC 2.67%
BAYER US FINANCE II LLC 144A 0.09%	ALPHABET CLASS A 2.14%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO MTN 0.09%	BROADCOM INC 1.79%
GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA (FXD-FRN) 0.08%	ALPHABET CLASS C 1.70%
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC/THE MTN 0.08%	META PLATFORMS CLASS A 1.56%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

IGSB and URTH on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	IGSB iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF	URTH iShares MSCI World ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	iShares	iShares
What it is	1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond	MSCI World
Total return, 1 year	+1.7%	+17.4%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−15.8 pts	−0.1 pts
Expense ratio	0.04%	0.24%
Holdings	4496	1230

IGSB in plain words

IGSB is a bond fund tracking the 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +1.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year.

URTH in plain words

URTH is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI World. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 70% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1230 positions, with the top ten at 26.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IGSB or URTH?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IGSB returned +1.7% and URTH returned +17.4%, so URTH returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, IGSB or URTH?: IGSB charges 0.04% a year and URTH charges 0.24%, so IGSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

IGSB against URTH, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, IGSB against URTH, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/igsb-vs-urth Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources