Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CGGR vs URTH: how they differ
CGGR and URTH hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and URTH returned more over the year.
Capital Group Growth ETF and iShares MSCI World ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and URTH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in CGGR | Only in URTH |
|---|---|
| Meta Platforms Inc 7.09% | NVIDIA 5.52% |
| Tesla Inc 5.85% | APPLE 5.28% |
| Broadcom Inc 5.40% | MICROSOFT 3.82% |
| NVIDIA Corp 5.16% | AMAZON.COM INC 2.67% |
| Micron Technology Inc 4.86% | ALPHABET CLASS A 2.14% |
| Microsoft Corp 4.38% | BROADCOM INC 1.79% |
| Alphabet Inc 3.36% | ALPHABET CLASS C 1.70% |
| Alphabet Inc 3.06% | META PLATFORMS CLASS A 1.56% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.
| CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF | URTH iShares MSCI World ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Capital Group | iShares |
| What it is | Growth | MSCI World |
| Total return, 1 year | +7.2% | +17.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −10.3 pts | −0.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.24% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 80.6% | 70.3% |
| Holdings | 89 | 1230 |
CGGR in plain words
CGGR is an index equity fund tracking the Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 81% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 89 positions, with the top ten at 44.2%.
URTH in plain words
URTH is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI World. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 70% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1230 positions, with the top ten at 26.8%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or URTH?
- In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +7.2% and URTH returned +17.4%, so URTH returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, CGGR or URTH?
- CGGR charges 0.39% a year and URTH charges 0.24%, so URTH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do CGGR and URTH overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 81% of CGGR and 70% of URTH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGGR against URTH, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cggr-vs-urth Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources