Which returned more over the last year, BOND or EMB?

In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −0.1% and EMB returned +2.8%, so EMB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BOND or EMB?

BOND charges 0.54% a year and EMB charges 0.39%, so EMB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BOND vs EMB: how they differ

BOND and EMB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EMB returned more over the year.

PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BOND and EMB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in BOND	Only in EMB
UMBS, TBA 4.80%	BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY 0.84%
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active 3.52%	EAGLE FUNDING LUXCO SARL RegS 0.50%
UMBS, TBA 2.98%	UKRAINE (REPUBLIC OF) C BONDS RegS 0.42%
United States Treasury 2.93%	ECUADOR REPUBLIC OF (GOVERNMENT) RegS 0.34%
UMBS, TBA 2.36%	GHANA (REPUBLIC OF) DISCO RegS 0.31%
United States Treasury 2.22%	CHINA LIFE INSURANCE OVERSEAS CO L RegS 0.28%
UMBS, TBA 2.19%	REPUBLIC OF HUNGARY 0.27%
UMBS, TBA 1.96%	ANGOLA (REPUBLIC OF) RegS 0.26%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

BOND and EMB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund	EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	PIMCO	iShares
What it is	Active Bond Exchange-Traded	J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond
Total return, 1 year	−0.1%	+2.8%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−17.6 pts	−14.7 pts
Expense ratio	0.54%	0.39%
Holdings	1565	612

BOND in plain words

BOND is a bond fund tracking the Active Bond Exchange-Traded. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.3% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

EMB in plain words

EMB is a bond fund tracking the J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BOND or EMB?: In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −0.1% and EMB returned +2.8%, so EMB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BOND or EMB?: BOND charges 0.54% a year and EMB charges 0.39%, so EMB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BOND against EMB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BOND against EMB, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bond-vs-emb Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources