Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

AVEM vs URTH: how they differ

AVEM and URTH hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and AVEM returned more over the year.

Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF and iShares MSCI World ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, AVEM and URTH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions AVEM and URTH both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingAVEMURTH
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd0.16%0.04%
Vodacom Group Ltd0.04%0.04%
Clicks Group Ltd0.03%0.04%
Canara Bank0.04%0.03%
Torrent Pharmaceuticals Ltd0.03%0.07%
Budimex SA0.03%0.06%
Telekom Malaysia Bhd0.02%0.20%
Discovery Ltd0.06%0.02%
Truworths International Ltd0.02%0.02%
Engie Energia Chile SA0.02%0.08%
Ayala Corp0.02%0.01%
Sappi Ltd0.01%0.01%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in AVEMOnly in URTH
SK hynix Inc 7.83%NVIDIA 5.52%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 6.33%APPLE 5.28%
Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 5.70%MICROSOFT 3.82%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 4.11%AMAZON.COM INC 2.67%
Tencent Holdings Ltd 1.51%ALPHABET CLASS A 2.14%
MediaTek Inc 1.11%BROADCOM INC 1.79%
China Construction Bank Corp 0.89%ALPHABET CLASS C 1.70%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd 0.81%META PLATFORMS CLASS A 1.56%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.

AVEM and URTH on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AVEM
Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerAvantisiShares
What it isEmerging Markets EquityMSCI World
Total return, 1 year+31.8%+17.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+14.3 pts−0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.33%0.24%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%70.3%
Holdings38971230

AVEM in plain words

AVEM is an index equity fund tracking the Emerging Markets Equity. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +31.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 3897 positions, with the top ten at 29.9%. It sat 4.2% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

URTH in plain words

URTH is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI World. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 70% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1230 positions, with the top ten at 26.8%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVEM or URTH?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVEM returned +31.8% and URTH returned +17.4%, so AVEM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, AVEM or URTH?
AVEM charges 0.33% a year and URTH charges 0.24%, so URTH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVEM and URTH overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of AVEM and 70% of URTH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

AVEM against URTH, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, AVEM against URTH, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/avem-vs-urth Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources