KARS vs LIMI: which is really different?

KARS and LIMI hold 12% of their weight in the same names. KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF and Themes Lithium & Battery Metal Miners ETF.

6.5%
KARS in the S&P 500
7.5%
LIMI in the S&P 500
−8.5%
KARS total return, 1 year
+12.1%
LIMI total return, 1 year
KARS · 1 year to Sep 30, 202694% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
94% of its weight is outside the S&P 5007% of KARS's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 94% is outside the index7%94%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 98% · top ten 40% of the fund · 86 holdings filed Sep 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 4% in94% of its weight is outside the S&P 5007% of KARS's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 94% is outside the index7%94%7% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 98% · top ten 40% of the fund

7% of KARS's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 94% is outside the index

LIMI · 1 year to Sep 25, 202693% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
93% of its weight is outside the S&P 5008% of LIMI's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 93% is outside the index8%93%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 53% of the fund · 41 holdings filed Jun 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in93% of its weight is outside the S&P 5008% of LIMI's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 93% is outside the index8%93%8% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 53% of the fund

8% of LIMI's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 93% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · LIMI scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, KARS and LIMI hold 12% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

half

12% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding KARS LIMI
PLS GROUP LTD 2.22% 9.08%
ALBEMARLE CORP 2.15% 7.46%
IGO LTD 0.98% 3.57%
MINERAL RESOURCES LTD 0.88% 3.10%
LITHIUM AMERICAS CORP 0.26% 3.16%
Only in KARS
Panasonic Holdings Corporation 4.95%
SAMSUNG SDI CO LTD 4.91%
STMICROELECTRONICS NV 4.83%
TESLA INC 4.35%
BYD CO LTD -A 4.22%
XIAOMI CORP-CLASS B 4.21%
BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AG 4.07%
CONTEMPORARY AMPEREX TECHN-A 3.49%
Only in LIMI
TINCI 7.02%
Tianqi Lithium Corp 5.52%
Zhejiang Huayou Cobalt Co Ltd 5.35%
Ganfeng Lithium Group Co Ltd 3.88%
Liontown Ltd 3.88%
Xiamen Tungsten Co Ltd 3.44%
CAPCHEM 3.35%
Elevra Lithium Ltd 3.11%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

12% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

Total returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
WindowKARSLIMIKARSLIMIKARSLIMI
3 months−12.4%−15.3%−14.9 pts−21.4 pts−14.5 pts−20.8 pts
6 months−13.8%−16.6%−30.8 pts−38.8 pts−40.7 pts−49.2 pts
1 year−8.5%+12.1%−24.3 pts−6.4 pts−32.3 pts−14.0 pts
3 years+2.6%not published−82.3 ptsnot published−107.3 ptsnot published
Since launch
KARS Jan 2018 · LIMI Sep 2024
+25.2%+62.3%−185.6 pts+24.2 pts−345.6 pts+7.4 pts

KARS and LIMI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

KARS
KraneShares Electric Vehicles and Future Mobility Index ETF · Holds 86 stocks in electric vehicles and batteries, 6% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
LIMI
Themes Lithium & Battery Metal Miners ETF · Holds 41 stocks in lithium and battery metals, 8% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer KraneShares Themes
Theme Electric vehicles and batteries Lithium and battery metals
In the S&P 500 6.5% 7.5%
Active share vs the S&P 500 98.1% 100.0%
In the Nasdaq-100 4.4% 0.0%
Holdings 86 41
Top ten, share of the fund 40.2% 52.6%
Expense ratio 0.69% 0.35%
Fee for the differing part 0.70% 0.35%
Total return, 1 year −8.5% +12.1%
vs the S&P 500 −24.3 pts −6.4 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100 −32.3 pts −14.0 pts
Below its high −44.6% −36.3%
Net assets $73m $2m

KARS and LIMI on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

KARS in plain words

By weight, 6% of KARS's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 40% of the fund across 86 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned −8.5% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 24.2 pts. It sits 44.6% below its all-time high of Nov 8, 2021.

LIMI in plain words

By weight, 8% of LIMI's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 53% of the fund across 41 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +12.1% with distributions reinvested against +18.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 6.4 pts. It sits 36.3% below its all-time high of May 6, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do KARS and LIMI hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 12% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, KARS or LIMI?
KARS has 6% of its weight in S&P 500 names and LIMI has 8%, so LIMI differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, KARS or LIMI?
KARS charges 0.69% a year and LIMI charges 0.35%, so LIMI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, KARS against LIMI, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/kars-vs-limi

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.