GLIX vs IFRA: which is really different?
IFRA holds 71.7% of its weight in S&P 500 companies and GLIX 49.3%. Lazard Listed Infrastructure ETF and iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF.
IFRA costs 0.66 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.1 points; IFRA is far larger, $4.0bn against $30m.
| GLIX | IFRA | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.96% | 0.30% |
| Net assets, GLIX as of Jun 30, 2026 and IFRA as of Oct 8, 2026 | $30m | $4.0bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +6.4% | +9.5% |
| What it tracks | Infrastructure | Infrastructure |
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| S&P 500, total return, 1 year | +17.3% | |
| Against the S&P 500, 1 year | behind by 10.8 pts | behind by 7.8 pts |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 98% | |
| Below its all-time high | 7.1%, high on Jun 26, 2026 | 10.6%, high on Jun 25, 2026 |
49% of GLIX's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 51% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.
72% of IFRA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 28% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.
A percentile among the 391 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →
Performance, window by window
| Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | GLIX | IFRA | GLIX | IFRA | GLIX | IFRA |
| 3 months | −5.9% | −7.3% | −9.3 pts | −10.6 pts | −9.6 pts | −10.9 pts |
| 6 months | −5.3% | −3.9% | −20.4 pts | −19.1 pts | −28.5 pts | −27.1 pts |
| 1 year | +6.4% | +9.5% | −10.8 pts | −7.8 pts | −17.2 pts | −14.1 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +64.5% | not published | −21.3 pts | not published | −42.8 pts |
| Since launch GLIX Oct 2025 · IFRA Apr 2018 | +6.4% | +164.1% | −10.8 pts | −69.5 pts | −17.8 pts | −230.2 pts |
Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
As of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GLIX in plain words
By weight, 49% of GLIX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 55% of the fund across 27 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 the fund returned +6.4% with distributions reinvested against +17.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 10.8 pts. It sits 7.1% below its all-time high of Jun 26, 2026.
IFRA in plain words
By weight, 72% of IFRA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 96%. The top ten holdings are 33% of the fund across 164 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 the fund returned +9.5% with distributions reinvested against +17.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 7.8 pts. It sits 10.6% below its all-time high of Jun 25, 2026.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation.
Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
ETFIQ, GLIX against IFRA, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/glix-vs-ifra
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). GLIX against IFRA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/glix-vs-ifra
[GLIX against IFRA (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/glix-vs-ifra)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.