BUG vs CIBR: which is really different?
BUG and CIBR hold 45% of their weight in the same names, and CIBR returned +36.4% over the year. Global X Cybersecurity ETF and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF.
22% of BUG's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 78% is outside the index
63% of CIBR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 37% is outside the index
A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BUG and CIBR hold 45% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026.
half
45% in common
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
45% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | BUG | CIBR | BUG | CIBR | BUG | CIBR |
| 3 months | +17.9% | +13.2% | +15.3 pts | +10.6 pts | +15.8 pts | +11.0 pts |
| 6 months | +82.2% | +63.4% | +65.3 pts | +46.4 pts | +55.4 pts | +36.5 pts |
| 1 year | +31.3% | +36.4% | +15.6 pts | +20.7 pts | +7.5 pts | +12.6 pts |
| 3 years | +90.6% | +129.8% | +5.6 pts | +44.9 pts | −19.4 pts | +19.9 pts |
| Since launch BUG Oct 2019 · CIBR Jul 2015 | +205.0% | +447.2% | +27.0 pts | +106.0 pts | −86.7 pts | −197.2 pts |
BUG and CIBR over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
BUG and CIBR on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BUG in plain words
By weight, 22% of BUG's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 64% of the fund across 34 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +31.3% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 15.6 pts.
CIBR in plain words
By weight, 63% of CIBR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 91%. The top ten holdings are 59% of the fund across 47 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +36.4% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 20.7 pts.
Questions people ask
- Do BUG and CIBR hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 45% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is a meaningful overlap. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, BUG against CIBR, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/bug-vs-cibr
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, BUG against CIBR, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/bug-vs-cibr Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, BUG against CIBR, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/bug-vs-cibr
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). BUG against CIBR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/bug-vs-cibr
- Markdown
- [BUG against CIBR (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/bug-vs-cibr)