BKGI vs CSIO: which is really different?
CSIO holds 54.2% of its weight in S&P 500 companies and BKGI 23.7%. BNY Mellon Global Infrastructure Income ETF and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF.
BKGI costs 0.10 points a year less; BKGI is far larger, $1.3bn against $44m.
| BKGI | CSIO | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.55% | 0.65% |
| Net assets, BKGI as of Jul 31, 2026 and CSIO as of Jun 30, 2026 | $1.3bn | $44m |
| Total return, 1 year | +10.1% | not published |
| What it tracks | Infrastructure | Infrastructure |
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| S&P 500, total return, 1 year | +17.3% | |
| S&P 500, total return, since Dec 10, 2025 | +14.4% | |
| Against the S&P 500, 1 year | behind by 7.2 pts | |
| Against the S&P 500, since Dec 10, 2025 | behind by 2.8 pts | |
| Below its all-time high | 10.0%, high on Jul 24, 2026 | 5.3%, high on Jul 24, 2026 |
24% of BKGI's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 76% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.
54% of CSIO's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 46% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.
A percentile among the 391 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →
Performance, window by window
| Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | BKGI | CSIO | BKGI | CSIO | BKGI | CSIO |
| 3 months | −6.9% | −4.3% | −10.3 pts | −7.6 pts | −10.5 pts | −7.9 pts |
| 6 months | −8.0% | −2.6% | −23.1 pts | −17.7 pts | −31.2 pts | −25.8 pts |
| 1 year | +10.1% | not published | −7.2 pts | not published | −13.5 pts | not published |
| 3 years | +77.7% | not published | −8.1 pts | not published | −29.6 pts | not published |
| Since launch BKGI Nov 2022 · CSIO Dec 2025 | +92.6% | +11.6% | −28.4 pts | −2.8 pts | −102.7 pts | −8.7 pts |
Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
As of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BKGI in plain words
By weight, 24% of BKGI's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 57% of the fund across 29 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 the fund returned +10.1% with distributions reinvested against +17.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 7.2 pts. It sits 10.0% below its all-time high of Jul 24, 2026.
CSIO in plain words
By weight, 54% of CSIO's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 52% of the fund across 29 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Since it first traded on Dec 10, 2025 the fund returned +11.6% with distributions reinvested against +14.4% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 2.8 pts. It sits 5.3% below its all-time high of Jul 24, 2026.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation.
Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
ETFIQ, BKGI against CSIO, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/bkgi-vs-csio
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). BKGI against CSIO. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/bkgi-vs-csio
[BKGI against CSIO (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/bkgi-vs-csio)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.