BILT vs EFRA: which is really different?

BILT and EFRA hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and BILT returned +8.5% over the year. iShares Infrastructure Active ETF and iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF.

EFRA costs 0.13 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.9 points; BILT is far larger, $112m against $5m.

BILTEFRA
Expense ratio0.60%0.47%
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026$112m$5m
Total return, 1 year+8.5%+5.6%
What it tracksInfrastructureInfrastructure
Holdings in common0%
S&P 500, total return, 1 year+17.3%
Against the S&P 500, 1 yearbehind by 8.7 ptsbehind by 11.6 pts
Below its all-time high7.6%, high on Jul 24, 20266.6%, high on Feb 27, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.

46.8%
BILT in the S&P 500
25.8%
EFRA in the S&P 500
+8.5%
BILT total return, 1 year
+5.6%
EFRA total return, 1 year
BILT · 1 year to Oct 9, 202653% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
53% of its weight is outside the S&P 50047% of BILT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 53% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.47%53%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 98% · top ten 42% of the fund · 237 holdings as published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 11% in53% of its weight is outside the S&P 50047% of BILT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 53% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.47%53%in the S&P 500outside the S&P 500active share 98% · Nasdaq-100: 11% in

47% of BILT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 53% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.

EFRA · 1 year to Oct 9, 202674% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
74% of its weight is outside the S&P 50026% of EFRA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 74% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.26%74%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 51% of the fund · 79 holdings as published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in74% of its weight is outside the S&P 50026% of EFRA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 74% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.26%74%inoutside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

26% of EFRA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 74% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · EFRA scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
0.1, the lowest in this set92.3, the highest

A percentile among the 391 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BILT and EFRA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding BILT EFRA
Only in BILT
UNION PACIFIC 5.47%
AENA SME SA 5.33%
AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER INC 4.90%
TC ENERGY 4.56%
XCEL ENERGY INC 4.39%
PPL CORP 3.58%
WILLIAMS 3.46%
SEMPRA 3.40%
Only in EFRA
VERALTO CORP 6.21%
WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE TECHNOLOGIE 6.00%
SMURFIT WESTROCK PLC 5.81%
XYLEM INC 5.77%
VEOLIA ENVIRON. SA 5.74%
AMERICAN WATER WORKS 5.65%
CLEAN HARBORS INC 4.59%
COMPANHIA DE SANEAMENTO BASICO DE 4.44%

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

Total returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
WindowBILTEFRABILTEFRABILTEFRA
3 months−6.4%−3.1%−9.8 pts−6.5 pts−10.1 pts−6.8 pts
6 months−5.7%−3.5%−20.9 pts−18.6 pts−28.9 pts−26.6 pts
1 year+8.5%+5.6%−8.7 pts−11.6 pts−15.1 pts−18.0 pts
3 yearsnot published+46.4%not published−39.4 ptsnot published−60.9 pts
Since launch
BILT Jul 2025 · EFRA Nov 2022
+12.4%+59.5%−12.4 pts−61.6 pts−21.3 pts−135.8 pts

Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

BILT
iShares Infrastructure Active ETF · Holds 237 stocks in infrastructure, 47% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
EFRA
iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF · Holds 79 stocks in infrastructure, 26% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Theme Infrastructure Infrastructure
In the S&P 500 46.8% 25.8%
Active share vs the S&P 500 98.1% 99.8%
In the Nasdaq-100 10.6% 0.0%
Holdings 237 79
Top ten, share of the fund 41.8% 51.3%
Expense ratio 0.60% 0.47%
Fee for the differing part 0.61% 0.47%
Total return, 1 year +8.5% +5.6%
vs the S&P 500 −8.7 pts −11.6 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100 −15.1 pts −18.0 pts
Below its high −7.6% −6.6%
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 $112m $5m

As of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

BILT in plain words

By weight, 47% of BILT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 42% of the fund across 237 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 the fund returned +8.5% with distributions reinvested against +17.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 8.7 pts. It sits 7.6% below its all-time high of Jul 24, 2026.

EFRA in plain words

By weight, 26% of EFRA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 51% of the fund across 79 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 the fund returned +5.6% with distributions reinvested against +17.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 11.6 pts. It sits 6.6% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do BILT and EFRA hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, BILT or EFRA?
BILT has 47% of its weight in S&P 500 names and EFRA has 26%, so EFRA differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, BILT or EFRA?
BILT charges 0.60% a year and EFRA charges 0.47%, so EFRA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation.

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, BILT against EFRA, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/bilt-vs-efra

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.