BILT vs EFRA: which is really different?
BILT and EFRA hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and BILT returned +8.5% over the year. iShares Infrastructure Active ETF and iShares Environmental Infrastructure and Industrials ETF.
EFRA costs 0.13 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.9 points; BILT is far larger, $112m against $5m.
| BILT | EFRA | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.60% | 0.47% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 | $112m | $5m |
| Total return, 1 year | +8.5% | +5.6% |
| What it tracks | Infrastructure | Infrastructure |
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| S&P 500, total return, 1 year | +17.3% | |
| Against the S&P 500, 1 year | behind by 8.7 pts | behind by 11.6 pts |
| Below its all-time high | 7.6%, high on Jul 24, 2026 | 6.6%, high on Feb 27, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.
47% of BILT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 53% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.
26% of EFRA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 74% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.
A percentile among the 391 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, BILT and EFRA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.
half
0% in common
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | BILT | EFRA | BILT | EFRA | BILT | EFRA |
| 3 months | −6.4% | −3.1% | −9.8 pts | −6.5 pts | −10.1 pts | −6.8 pts |
| 6 months | −5.7% | −3.5% | −20.9 pts | −18.6 pts | −28.9 pts | −26.6 pts |
| 1 year | +8.5% | +5.6% | −8.7 pts | −11.6 pts | −15.1 pts | −18.0 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +46.4% | not published | −39.4 pts | not published | −60.9 pts |
| Since launch BILT Jul 2025 · EFRA Nov 2022 | +12.4% | +59.5% | −12.4 pts | −61.6 pts | −21.3 pts | −135.8 pts |
Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
As of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BILT in plain words
By weight, 47% of BILT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 42% of the fund across 237 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 the fund returned +8.5% with distributions reinvested against +17.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 8.7 pts. It sits 7.6% below its all-time high of Jul 24, 2026.
EFRA in plain words
By weight, 26% of EFRA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 51% of the fund across 79 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 the fund returned +5.6% with distributions reinvested against +17.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 11.6 pts. It sits 6.6% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do BILT and EFRA hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation.
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.
Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
ETFIQ, BILT against EFRA, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/bilt-vs-efra
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). BILT against EFRA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/bilt-vs-efra
[BILT against EFRA (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/bilt-vs-efra)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.