SSO vs UPRO: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, SSO finished 1.4 points short and UPRO 2.6 points short. ProShares Ultra S&P500 and ProShares UltraPro S&P500.

+3.3%
SSO returned, 3 months
+4.1%
UPRO returned, 3 months
−1.7 pts
SSO from its stated multiple
−3.4 pts
UPRO from its stated multiple
SSO · 3 months to Sep 30, 20261.7 pts short of its stated multiple
1.7 pts short of its stated multipleSSO returned +3.3% while 2 times SPY's move would have been +5.0%SPY +2.5% ×2 implies+5.0%SSO returned+3.3%1.7 pts short of its stated multipleSSO returned +3.3% while 2 times SPY's move would have been +5.0%SPY +2.5% ×2 implies+5.0%SSO returned+3.3%

SSO returned +3.3% while 2 times SPY's move would have been +5.0%

UPRO · 3 months to Sep 30, 20263.4 pts short of its stated multiple
3.4 pts short of its stated multipleUPRO returned +4.1% while 3 times SPY's move would have been +7.6%SPY +2.5% ×3 implies+7.6%UPRO returned+4.1%3.4 pts short of its stated multipleUPRO returned +4.1% while 3 times SPY's move would have been +7.6%SPY +2.5% ×3 implies+7.6%UPRO returned+4.1%

UPRO returned +4.1% while 3 times SPY's move would have been +7.6%

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · SSO scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?
0.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowSSOUPROSSOUPROSSOUPRO
1 month−1.2%−2.0%−0.7%−1.0%−0.5 pts−1.0 pts
3 months+3.3%+4.1%+5.0%+7.6%−1.7 pts−3.4 pts
6 months+32.2%+48.8%+34.0%+50.9%−1.8 pts−2.1 pts
1 year+24.6%+33.0%+31.4%+47.1%−6.8 pts−14.1 pts
3 years+166.2%+267.2%+170.0%+254.9%−3.8 pts+12.3 pts
Since launch
SSO Jan 2010 · UPRO Jan 2010
+2980.8%+7040.0%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful

SSO and UPRO over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

SSO
ProShares Ultra S&P500 · Aims to return twice the daily move of the S&P 500
UPRO
ProShares UltraPro S&P500 · Aims to return three times the daily move of the S&P 500
Issuer ProShares ProShares
Sets out to return +2x +3x
Underlying asset SPY SPY
Segment us large cap us large cap
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch +3.3% +4.1%
Underlying returned, over that window +2.5% +2.5%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window +5.0% +7.6%
Difference from stated, over that window −1.7 pts −3.4 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch +24.6% +33.0%
Difference from stated, over that window −6.8 pts −14.1 pts
Underlying volatility 11% 11%
Difference over the days both have traded −1.7 pts −3.4 pts
Expense ratio 0.84% 0.88%
Launched Jan 4, 2010 Jan 4, 2010
Net assets $8.4bn $5.3bn

SSO and UPRO on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

SSO in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: SSO returned +3.3% where its own daily promise gave +4.8%, 1.4 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times SPY's 2.5% implies +5.0%, which makes SSO look 1.7 points short. 0.3 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. SSO aims to return +2 times SPY's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. SPY moved at 11% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

UPRO in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: UPRO returned +4.1% where its own daily promise gave +6.8%, 2.6 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 3 times SPY's 2.5% implies +7.6%, which makes UPRO look 3.4 points short. 0.8 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 3 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. UPRO aims to return +3 times SPY's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +3 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, SSO or UPRO?
Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, SSO finished 1.7 points from what its multiple implies and UPRO finished 3.4 points from its own, so SSO came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are SSO and UPRO levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on the S&P 500, SSO at +2 times and UPRO at +3 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, SSO or UPRO?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window SSO’s moved at 11% annualized and UPRO’s at 11%, so SSO has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold SSO or UPRO for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, SSO or UPRO?
SSO charges 0.84% a year and UPRO charges 0.88%, so SSO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, SSO against UPRO, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/sso-vs-upro

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.