SPXS vs SPXU: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, SPXS finished 2.1 points from its stated multiple and SPXU 2.1. Direxion Daily S&P 500(R) Bear 3X ETF and ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500.

−5.5%
SPXS returned, 3 months
−5.4%
SPXU returned, 3 months
+2.1 pts
SPXS from its stated multiple
+2.1 pts
SPXU from its stated multiple
SPXS · 3 months to Sep 30, 20262.1 pts ahead of its stated multiple
2.1 pts ahead of its stated multipleSPXS returned −5.5% while −3 times SPY's move would have been −7.6%SPY +2.5% ×−3 implies−7.6%SPXS returned−5.5%2.1 pts ahead of its stated multipleSPXS returned −5.5% while −3 times SPY's move would have been −7.6%SPY +2.5% ×−3 implies−7.6%SPXS returned−5.5%

SPXS returned −5.5% while −3 times SPY's move would have been −7.6%

SPXU · 3 months to Sep 30, 20262.1 pts ahead of its stated multiple
2.1 pts ahead of its stated multipleSPXU returned −5.4% while −3 times SPY's move would have been −7.6%SPY +2.5% ×−3 implies−7.6%SPXU returned−5.4%2.1 pts ahead of its stated multipleSPXU returned −5.4% while −3 times SPY's move would have been −7.6%SPY +2.5% ×−3 implies−7.6%SPXU returned−5.4%

SPXU returned −5.4% while −3 times SPY's move would have been −7.6%

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · SPXU scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?
0.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

A percentile among the 125 inverse ETFs over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowSPXSSPXUSPXSSPXUSPXSSPXU
1 month+1.6%+1.6%+1.0%+1.0%+0.7 pts+0.6 pts
3 months−5.5%−5.4%−7.6%−7.6%+2.1 pts+2.1 pts
6 months−35.9%−35.9%−50.9%−50.9%+15.0 pts+15.1 pts
1 year−32.3%−32.4%−47.1%−47.1%+14.8 pts+14.8 pts
3 years−82.2%−82.5%−254.9%−254.9%+172.8 pts+172.4 pts
Since launch
SPXS Jan 2010 · SPXU Jan 2010
−100.0%−100.0%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful

SPXS and SPXU over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

SPXS
Direxion Daily S&P 500(R) Bear 3X ETF · Aims to return three times the opposite of the daily move of the S&P 500
SPXU
ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 · Aims to return three times the opposite of the daily move of the S&P 500
Issuer Direxion ProShares
Sets out to return -3x -3x
Underlying asset SPY SPY
Segment us large cap us large cap
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch −5.5% −5.4%
Underlying returned, over that window +2.5% +2.5%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window −7.6% −7.6%
Difference from stated, over that window +2.1 pts +2.1 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch −32.3% −32.4%
Difference from stated, over that window +14.8 pts +14.8 pts
Underlying volatility 11% 11%
Difference over the days both have traded +2.1 pts +2.1 pts
Expense ratio 1.04% 0.90%
Launched Jan 4, 2010 Jan 4, 2010
Net assets $334m $430m

SPXS and SPXU on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

SPXS in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: SPXS returned −5.5% where its own daily promise gave −8.9%, 3.4 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −3 times SPY's 2.5% implies −7.6%, which makes SPXS look 2.1 points over. 1.3 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −3 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. SPXS aims to return -3 times SPY's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -3 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. SPY moved at 11% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

SPXU in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: SPXU returned −5.4% where its own daily promise gave −8.9%, 3.4 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −3 times SPY's 2.5% implies −7.6%, which makes SPXU look 2.1 points over. SPXU aims to return -3 times SPY's move each day, then resets.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, SPXS or SPXU?
Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, SPXS finished 2.1 points from what its multiple implies and SPXU finished 2.1 points from its own, so SPXS came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are SPXS and SPXU levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on the S&P 500, SPXS at -3 times and SPXU at -3 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, SPXS or SPXU?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window SPXS’s moved at 11% annualized and SPXU’s at 11%, so SPXS has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold SPXS or SPXU for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, SPXS or SPXU?
SPXS charges 1.04% a year and SPXU charges 0.90%, so SPXU is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, SPXS against SPXU, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/spxs-vs-spxu

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.