NVD vs NVDQ: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, NVD finished 0.4 points from its stated multiple and NVDQ 1.6. GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF and T-REX 2X INVERSE NVIDIA DAILY TARGET ETF.

−31.8%
NVD returned, 3 months
−33.0%
NVDQ returned, 3 months
−0.4 pts
NVD from its stated multiple
−1.6 pts
NVDQ from its stated multiple
NVD · 3 months to Sep 30, 2026On its stated multiple
On its stated multipleNVD returned −31.8% while −2 times NVDA's move would have been −31.4%NVDA +15.7% ×−2 implies−31.4%NVD returned−31.8%On its stated multipleNVD returned −31.8% while −2 times NVDA's move would have been −31.4%NVDA +15.7% ×−2 implies−31.4%NVD returned−31.8%

NVD returned −31.8% while −2 times NVDA's move would have been −31.4%

NVDQ · 3 months to Sep 30, 20261.6 pts short of its stated multiple
1.6 pts short of its stated multipleNVDQ returned −33.0% while −2 times NVDA's move would have been −31.4%NVDA +15.7% ×−2 implies−31.4%NVDQ returned−33.0%1.6 pts short of its stated multipleNVDQ returned −33.0% while −2 times NVDA's move would have been −31.4%NVDA +15.7% ×−2 implies−31.4%NVDQ returned−33.0%

NVDQ returned −33.0% while −2 times NVDA's move would have been −31.4%

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · NVD scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?
0.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

A percentile among the 125 inverse ETFs over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowNVDNVDQNVDNVDQNVDNVDQ
1 month−7.4%−8.0%−7.1%−7.1%−0.3 pts−0.9 pts
3 months−31.8%−33.0%−31.4%−31.4%−0.4 pts−1.6 pts
6 months−51.1%−52.7%−60.5%−60.5%+9.3 pts+7.8 pts
1 year−53.1%−55.5%−45.4%−45.4%−7.7 pts−10.2 pts
3 years−99.3%not publishednot meaningfulnot publishednot meaningfulnot published
Since launch
NVD Aug 2023 · NVDQ Oct 2023
−99.2%−99.5%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful

NVD and NVDQ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

NVD
GraniteShares 2x Short NVDA Daily ETF · Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of NVIDIA (NVDA)
NVDQ
T-REX 2X INVERSE NVIDIA DAILY TARGET ETF · Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of NVIDIA (NVDA)
Issuer GraniteShares T-REX
Sets out to return -2x -2x
Underlying asset NVDA NVDA
Segment company company
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch −31.8% −33.0%
Underlying returned, over that window +15.7% +15.7%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window −31.4% −31.4%
Difference from stated, over that window −0.4 pts −1.6 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch −53.1% −55.5%
Difference from stated, over that window −7.7 pts −10.2 pts
Underlying volatility 38% 38%
Difference over the days both have traded −0.4 pts −1.6 pts
Expense ratio 1.35% 1.05%
Launched Aug 22, 2023 Oct 19, 2023
Net assets $55m $17m

NVD and NVDQ on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

NVD in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: NVD returned −31.8% where its own daily promise gave −33.3%, 1.4 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times NVDA's 15.7% implies −31.4%, which makes NVD look 0.4 points short. 1.8 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. NVD aims to return -2 times NVDA's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. NVDA moved at 38% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

NVDQ in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: NVDQ returned −33.0% where its own daily promise gave −33.3%, 0.2 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times NVDA's 15.7% implies −31.4%, which makes NVDQ look 1.6 points short. NVDQ aims to return -2 times NVDA's move each day, then resets.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, NVD or NVDQ?
Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, NVD finished 0.4 points from what its multiple implies and NVDQ finished 1.6 points from its own, so NVD came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are NVD and NVDQ levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on NVIDIA, NVD at -2 times and NVDQ at -2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, NVD or NVDQ?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window NVD’s moved at 38% annualized and NVDQ’s at 38%, so NVD has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold NVD or NVDQ for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, NVD or NVDQ?
NVD charges 1.35% a year and NVDQ charges 1.05%, so NVDQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, NVD against NVDQ, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/nvd-vs-nvdq

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.