HOOG vs ROBN: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, HOOG finished 5.5 points from its stated multiple and ROBN 5.2. Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF and T-REX 2X LONG HOOD DAILY TARGET ETF.

−8.2%
HOOG returned, 3 months
−8.3%
ROBN returned, 3 months
−15.3 pts
HOOG from its stated multiple
−15.4 pts
ROBN from its stated multiple
HOOG · 3 months to Sep 30, 202615.3 pts short of its stated multiple
15.3 pts short of its stated multipleHOOG returned −8.2% while 2 times HOOD's move would have been +7.1%HOOD +3.5% ×2 implies+7.1%HOOG returned−8.2%15.3 pts short of its stated multipleHOOG returned −8.2% while 2 times HOOD's move would have been +7.1%HOOD +3.5% ×2 implies+7.1%HOOG returned−8.2%

HOOG returned −8.2% while 2 times HOOD's move would have been +7.1%

ROBN · 3 months to Sep 30, 202615.4 pts short of its stated multiple
15.4 pts short of its stated multipleROBN returned −8.3% while 2 times HOOD's move would have been +7.1%HOOD +3.5% ×2 implies+7.1%ROBN returned−8.3%15.4 pts short of its stated multipleROBN returned −8.3% while 2 times HOOD's move would have been +7.1%HOOD +3.5% ×2 implies+7.1%ROBN returned−8.3%

ROBN returned −8.3% while 2 times HOOD's move would have been +7.1%

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · HOOG scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?
0.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowHOOGROBNHOOGROBNHOOGROBN
1 month+9.1%+9.5%+14.7%+14.7%−5.5 pts−5.2 pts
3 months−8.2%−8.3%+7.1%+7.1%−15.3 pts−15.4 pts
6 months+83.7%+84.5%+120.9%+120.9%−37.2 pts−36.5 pts
1 year−68.8%−68.8%−42.9%−42.9%−26.0 pts−26.0 pts
Since launch
HOOG Mar 2025 · ROBN Jan 2025
+133.1%+39.8%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful

HOOG and ROBN over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

HOOG
Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of Robinhood Markets (HOOD)
ROBN
T-REX 2X LONG HOOD DAILY TARGET ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of Robinhood Markets (HOOD)
Issuer Leverage Shares T-REX
Sets out to return +2x +2x
Underlying asset HOOD HOOD
Segment company company
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch −8.2% −8.3%
Underlying returned, over that window +3.5% +3.5%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window +7.1% +7.1%
Difference from stated, over that window −15.3 pts −15.4 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch −68.8% −68.8%
Difference from stated, over that window −26.0 pts −26.0 pts
Underlying volatility 71% 71%
Difference over the days both have traded −5.5 pts −5.2 pts
Expense ratio 0.85% 1.05%
Launched Mar 21, 2025 Jan 31, 2025
Net assets $56m $118m

HOOG and ROBN on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

HOOG in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: HOOG returned −8.2% where its own daily promise gave −4.3%, 3.9 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times HOOD's 3.5% implies +7.1%, which makes HOOG look 15.3 points short. 11.4 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. HOOG aims to return +2 times HOOD's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. HOOD moved at 71% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

ROBN in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: ROBN returned −8.3% where its own daily promise gave −4.3%, 4.0 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times HOOD's 3.5% implies +7.1%, which makes ROBN look 15.4 points short. ROBN aims to return +2 times HOOD's move each day, then resets.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, HOOG or ROBN?
Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, HOOG finished 15.3 points from what its multiple implies and ROBN finished 15.4 points from its own, so HOOG came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are HOOG and ROBN levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Robinhood Markets, HOOG at +2 times and ROBN at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, HOOG or ROBN?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window HOOG’s moved at 71% annualized and ROBN’s at 71%, so HOOG has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold HOOG or ROBN for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, HOOG or ROBN?
HOOG charges 0.85% a year and ROBN charges 1.05%, so HOOG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, HOOG against ROBN, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/hoog-vs-robn

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.