HOOG vs HOOX: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, HOOG finished 5.5 points from its stated multiple and HOOX 5.5. Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF.

−8.2%
HOOG returned, 3 months
−8.5%
HOOX returned, 3 months
−15.3 pts
HOOG from its stated multiple
−15.6 pts
HOOX from its stated multiple
HOOG · 3 months to Sep 30, 202615.3 pts short of its stated multiple
15.3 pts short of its stated multipleHOOG returned −8.2% while 2 times HOOD's move would have been +7.1%HOOD +3.5% ×2 implies+7.1%HOOG returned−8.2%15.3 pts short of its stated multipleHOOG returned −8.2% while 2 times HOOD's move would have been +7.1%HOOD +3.5% ×2 implies+7.1%HOOG returned−8.2%

HOOG returned −8.2% while 2 times HOOD's move would have been +7.1%

HOOX · 3 months to Sep 30, 202615.6 pts short of its stated multiple
15.6 pts short of its stated multipleHOOX returned −8.5% while 2 times HOOD's move would have been +7.1%HOOD +3.5% ×2 implies+7.1%HOOX returned−8.5%15.6 pts short of its stated multipleHOOX returned −8.5% while 2 times HOOD's move would have been +7.1%HOOD +3.5% ×2 implies+7.1%HOOX returned−8.5%

HOOX returned −8.5% while 2 times HOOD's move would have been +7.1%

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · HOOG scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?
0.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowHOOGHOOXHOOGHOOXHOOGHOOX
1 month+9.1%+9.2%+14.7%+14.7%−5.5 pts−5.5 pts
3 months−8.2%−8.5%+7.1%+7.1%−15.3 pts−15.6 pts
6 months+83.7%+84.2%+120.9%+120.9%−37.2 pts−36.8 pts
1 year−68.8%−69.4%−42.9%−42.9%−26.0 pts−26.5 pts
Since launch
HOOG Mar 2025 · HOOX Mar 2025
+133.1%+142.7%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful

HOOG and HOOX over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

HOOG
Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of Robinhood Markets (HOOD)
HOOX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of Robinhood Markets (HOOD)
Issuer Leverage Shares Defiance
Sets out to return +2x +2x
Underlying asset HOOD HOOD
Segment company company
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch −8.2% −8.5%
Underlying returned, over that window +3.5% +3.5%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window +7.1% +7.1%
Difference from stated, over that window −15.3 pts −15.6 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch −68.8% −69.4%
Difference from stated, over that window −26.0 pts −26.5 pts
Underlying volatility 71% 71%
Difference over the days both have traded −5.5 pts −5.5 pts
Expense ratio 0.85% 1.32%
Launched Mar 21, 2025 Mar 19, 2025
Net assets $56m $29m

HOOG and HOOX on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

HOOG in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: HOOG returned −8.2% where its own daily promise gave −4.3%, 3.9 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times HOOD's 3.5% implies +7.1%, which makes HOOG look 15.3 points short. 11.4 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. HOOG aims to return +2 times HOOD's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. HOOD moved at 71% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

HOOX in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: HOOX returned −8.5% where its own daily promise gave −4.3%, 4.1 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times HOOD's 3.5% implies +7.1%, which makes HOOX look 15.6 points short. HOOX aims to return +2 times HOOD's move each day, then resets.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, HOOG or HOOX?
Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, HOOG finished 15.3 points from what its multiple implies and HOOX finished 15.6 points from its own, so HOOG came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are HOOG and HOOX levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Robinhood Markets, HOOG at +2 times and HOOX at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, HOOG or HOOX?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window HOOG’s moved at 71% annualized and HOOX’s at 71%, so HOOG has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold HOOG or HOOX for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, HOOG or HOOX?
HOOG charges 0.85% a year and HOOX charges 1.32%, so HOOG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, HOOG against HOOX, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/hoog-vs-hoox

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.