ERX vs XLEX: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, ERX finished 0.4 points from its stated multiple and XLEX 1.8. Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X ETF and Corgi U.S. Energy 2x Daily ETF.

+33.9%
ERX returned, 3 months
+32.5%
XLEX returned, 3 months
−0.4 pts
ERX from its stated multiple
−1.8 pts
XLEX from its stated multiple
ERX · 3 months to Sep 30, 2026On its stated multiple
On its stated multipleERX returned +33.9% while 2 times XLE's move would have been +34.3%XLE +17.2% ×2 implies+34.3%ERX returned+33.9%On its stated multipleERX returned +33.9% while 2 times XLE's move would have been +34.3%XLE +17.2% ×2 implies+34.3%ERX returned+33.9%

ERX returned +33.9% while 2 times XLE's move would have been +34.3%

XLEX · 3 months to Sep 30, 20261.8 pts short of its stated multiple
1.8 pts short of its stated multipleXLEX returned +32.5% while 2 times XLE's move would have been +34.3%XLE +17.2% ×2 implies+34.3%XLEX returned+32.5%1.8 pts short of its stated multipleXLEX returned +32.5% while 2 times XLE's move would have been +34.3%XLE +17.2% ×2 implies+34.3%XLEX returned+32.5%

XLEX returned +32.5% while 2 times XLE's move would have been +34.3%

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · ERX scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?
0.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowERXXLEXERXXLEXERXXLEX
1 month−7.0%−7.2%−6.5%−6.5%−0.5 pts−0.7 pts
3 months+33.9%+32.5%+34.3%+34.3%−0.4 pts−1.8 pts
6 months+6.0%not published+11.3%not published−5.4 ptsnot published
1 year+81.1%not published+83.2%not published−2.1 ptsnot published
3 years+60.7%not published+99.1%not published−38.3 ptsnot published
Since launch
ERX Jan 2010 · XLEX Jun 2026
−71.0%+6.7%not meaningful+12.3%not meaningful−5.6 pts

ERX and XLEX over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

ERX
Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of energy (XLE)
XLEX
Corgi U.S. Energy 2x Daily ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of energy (XLE)
Issuer Direxion Corgi
Sets out to return +2x +2x
Underlying asset XLE XLE
Segment sector sector
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch +33.9% +32.5%
Underlying returned, over that window +17.2% +17.2%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window +34.3% +34.3%
Difference from stated, over that window −0.4 pts −1.8 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch +81.1% +6.7%
Difference from stated, over that window −2.1 pts −5.6 pts
Underlying volatility 21% 21%
Difference over the days both have traded −0.4 pts −1.8 pts
Expense ratio 0.91% 0.45%
Launched Jan 4, 2010 Jun 3, 2026
Net assets $232m $820,603

ERX and XLEX on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ERX in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: ERX returned +33.9% where its own daily promise gave +35.7%, 1.8 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times XLE's 17.2% implies +34.3%, which makes ERX look 0.4 points short. 1.4 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. ERX aims to return +2 times XLE's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. XLE moved at 21% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

XLEX in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: XLEX returned +32.5% where its own daily promise gave +35.7%, 3.2 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times XLE's 17.2% implies +34.3%, which makes XLEX look 1.8 points short. XLEX aims to return +2 times XLE's move each day, then resets.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, ERX or XLEX?
Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, ERX finished 0.4 points from what its multiple implies and XLEX finished 1.8 points from its own, so ERX came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are ERX and XLEX levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on energy, ERX at +2 times and XLEX at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, ERX or XLEX?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window ERX’s moved at 21% annualized and XLEX’s at 21%, so ERX has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold ERX or XLEX for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, ERX or XLEX?
ERX charges 0.91% a year and XLEX charges 0.45%, so XLEX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, ERX against XLEX, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/erx-vs-xlex

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.