AAPD vs AAPX: which held to its multiple?
Over three months against its own daily promise, AAPD finished 1.4 points over and AAPX 2.8 points short. Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X ETF and T-REX 2X LONG APPLE DAILY TARGET ETF.
AAPD returned −12.0% while −1 times AAPL's move would have been −13.2%
AAPX returned +22.8% while 2 times AAPL's move would have been +26.4%
AAPD among the 125 inverse ETFs over three months
AAPX among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months
A percentile among the 125 inverse ETFs over three months. AAPX is a percentile among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months, a different set, so the two marks are not on one scale. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Multiple would give | Difference | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | AAPD | AAPX | AAPD | AAPX | AAPD | AAPX |
| 1 month | −4.6% | +9.2% | −5.1% | +10.2% | +0.5 pts | −1.0 pts |
| 3 months | −12.0% | +22.8% | −13.2% | +26.4% | +1.2 pts | −3.6 pts |
| 6 months | −23.9% | +54.9% | −30.5% | +61.0% | +6.6 pts | −6.1 pts |
| 1 year | −23.6% | +43.6% | −31.3% | +62.5% | +7.6 pts | −18.9 pts |
| 3 years | −49.2% | not published | −97.1% | not published | +47.9 pts | not published |
| Since launch AAPD Aug 2022 · AAPX Jan 2024 | −52.4% | +94.7% | not meaningful | +163.2% | not meaningful | −68.6 pts |
AAPD and AAPX over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
AAPD and AAPX on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AAPD in plain words
Three months to Sep 30, 2026: AAPD returned −12.0% where its own daily promise gave −13.4%, 1.4 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −1 times AAPL's 13.2% implies −13.2%, which makes AAPD look 1.2 points over. 0.2 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −1 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. AAPD aims to return -1 times AAPL's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -1 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. AAPL moved at 28% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.
AAPX in plain words
Three months to Sep 30, 2026: AAPX returned +22.8% where its own daily promise gave +25.6%, 2.8 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times AAPL's 13.2% implies +26.4%, which makes AAPX look 3.6 points short. 0.8 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. AAPX aims to return +2 times AAPL's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.
Questions people ask
- Which came closer to its stated multiple, AAPD or AAPX?
- Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, AAPD finished 1.2 points from what its multiple implies and AAPX finished 3.6 points from its own, so AAPD came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
- Are AAPD and AAPX levered on the same thing?
- Yes. Both are levered on Apple, AAPD at -1 times and AAPX at +2 times the daily move.
- Which one decays faster, AAPD or AAPX?
- Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window AAPD’s moved at 28% annualized and AAPX’s at 28%, so AAPD has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
- Can I hold AAPD or AAPX for a year?
- Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, AAPD against AAPX, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/aapd-vs-aapx
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, AAPD against AAPX, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/aapd-vs-aapx Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, AAPD against AAPX, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/aapd-vs-aapx
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). AAPD against AAPX. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/aapd-vs-aapx
- Markdown
- [AAPD against AAPX (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/aapd-vs-aapx)