AAPD vs AAPU: which held to its multiple?
Over three months against its own daily promise, AAPD finished 1.4 points over and AAPU 2.7 points short. Direxion Daily AAPL Bear 1X ETF and Direxion Daily AAPL Bull 2X ETF.
AAPD returned −12.0% while −1 times AAPL's move would have been −13.2%
AAPU returned +22.9% while 2 times AAPL's move would have been +26.4%
AAPD among the 125 inverse ETFs over three months
AAPU among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months
A percentile among the 125 inverse ETFs over three months. AAPU is a percentile among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months, a different set, so the two marks are not on one scale. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Multiple would give | Difference | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | AAPD | AAPU | AAPD | AAPU | AAPD | AAPU |
| 1 month | −4.6% | +8.9% | −5.1% | +10.2% | +0.5 pts | −1.3 pts |
| 3 months | −12.0% | +22.9% | −13.2% | +26.4% | +1.2 pts | −3.5 pts |
| 6 months | −23.9% | +56.9% | −30.5% | +61.0% | +6.6 pts | −4.1 pts |
| 1 year | −23.6% | +48.4% | −31.3% | +62.5% | +7.6 pts | −14.2 pts |
| 3 years | −49.2% | +141.2% | −97.1% | +194.2% | +47.9 pts | −53.0 pts |
| Since launch AAPD Aug 2022 · AAPU Aug 2022 | −52.4% | +132.8% | not meaningful | not meaningful | not meaningful | not meaningful |
AAPD and AAPU over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
AAPD and AAPU on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
AAPD in plain words
Three months to Sep 30, 2026: AAPD returned −12.0% where its own daily promise gave −13.4%, 1.4 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −1 times AAPL's 13.2% implies −13.2%, which makes AAPD look 1.2 points over. 0.2 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −1 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. AAPD aims to return -1 times AAPL's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -1 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. AAPL moved at 28% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.
AAPU in plain words
Three months to Sep 30, 2026: AAPU returned +22.9% where its own daily promise gave +25.6%, 2.7 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times AAPL's 13.2% implies +26.4%, which makes AAPU look 3.5 points short. 0.8 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. AAPU aims to return +2 times AAPL's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.
Questions people ask
- Which came closer to its stated multiple, AAPD or AAPU?
- Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, AAPD finished 1.2 points from what its multiple implies and AAPU finished 3.5 points from its own, so AAPD came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
- Are AAPD and AAPU levered on the same thing?
- Yes. Both are levered on Apple, AAPD at -1 times and AAPU at +2 times the daily move.
- Which one decays faster, AAPD or AAPU?
- Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window AAPD’s moved at 28% annualized and AAPU’s at 28%, so AAPD has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
- Can I hold AAPD or AAPU for a year?
- Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, AAPD against AAPU, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/aapd-vs-aapu
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, AAPD against AAPU, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/aapd-vs-aapu Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, AAPD against AAPU, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/aapd-vs-aapu
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). AAPD against AAPU. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/aapd-vs-aapu
- Markdown
- [AAPD against AAPU (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/aapd-vs-aapu)