Data as of .
TSLG vs TSLR: which held to its multiple?
Over the days both have traded, TSLG finished 2.4 points from its stated multiple and TSLR 2.1.
ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: TSLR scores higher
Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?
A percentile among the 391 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Multiple would give | Difference | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TSLG | TSLR | TSLG | TSLR | TSLG | TSLR | |
| 1 month | +20.8% | +21.1% | +23.2% | +23.2% | −2.4 pts | −2.1 pts |
| 3 months | −27.9% | −27.7% | −20.2% | −20.2% | −7.8 pts | −7.5 pts |
| 6 months | −28.4% | −27.7% | −13.2% | −13.2% | −15.2 pts | −14.5 pts |
| 1 year | −30.9% | −29.7% | −1.8% | −1.8% | −29.1 pts | −27.9 pts |
| 3 years | not published | −46.8% | not published | +73.2% | not published | −120.1 pts |
| Since launch | −68.4% | −34.0% | −32.5% | +113.4% | −36.0 pts | −147.4 pts |
| TSLG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF Aims to return twice the daily move of Tesla (TSLA) | TSLR GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF Aims to return twice the daily move of Tesla (TSLA) | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Leverage Shares | GraniteShares |
| Sets out to return | +2x | +2x |
| On | TSLA | TSLA |
| Segment | company | company |
| Fund returned, 3 months | −27.9% | −27.7% |
| Underlying returned, 3 months | −10.1% | −10.1% |
| What the stated multiple implies, 3 months | −20.2% | −20.2% |
| Difference from stated, 3 months | −7.8 pts | −7.5 pts |
| Fund returned, 1 year or since launch | −30.9% | −29.7% |
| Difference from stated, over that window | −29.1 pts | −27.9 pts |
| Underlying volatility | 56% | 56% |
| Difference over the days both have traded | −2.4 pts | −2.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.80% | 0.95% |
| Launched | Dec 13, 2024 | Aug 22, 2023 |
TSLG in plain words
Three months to Sep 11, 2026: TSLG returned −27.9% where its own daily promise gave −25.7%, 2.2 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times TSLA's −10.1% implies −20.2%, which makes TSLG look 7.8 points short. 5.6 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. TSLG aims to return +2 times TSLA's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. TSLA moved at 56% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.
TSLR in plain words
Three months to Sep 11, 2026: TSLR returned −27.7% where its own daily promise gave −25.7%, 2.0 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times TSLA's −10.1% implies −20.2%, which makes TSLR look 7.5 points short. TSLR aims to return +2 times TSLA's move each day, then resets.
Questions people ask
- Which came closer to its stated multiple, TSLG or TSLR?
- Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, TSLG finished 7.8 points from what its multiple implies and TSLR finished 7.5 points from its own, so TSLR came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
- Are TSLG and TSLR levered on the same thing?
- Yes. Both are levered on Tesla, TSLG at +2 times and TSLR at +2 times the daily move.
- Which one decays faster, TSLG or TSLR?
- Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window TSLG’s moved at 56% annualized and TSLR’s at 56%, so TSLG has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
- Can I hold TSLG or TSLR for a year?
- Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
- Which is cheaper, TSLG or TSLR?
- TSLG charges 0.80% a year and TSLR charges 0.95%, so TSLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, TSLG against TSLR, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/TSLG-TSLR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.