Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

TSLR vs TSLS: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, TSLR finished 2.0 points short and TSLS 2.1 points over.

GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF and Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−27.7%TSLR returned, 3 months
+5.0%TSLS returned, 3 months
−7.5 ptsTSLR from its stated multiple
−5.1 ptsTSLS from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: TSLR scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

TSLR 71.5TSLS 66.90.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 391 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

TSLR7.5 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
TSLA −10.1% ×2 implies−20.2%TSLR returned−27.7%TSLA −10.1% ×2 implies−20.2%TSLR returned−27.7%
TSLS5.1 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
TSLA −10.1% ×1 implies+10.1%TSLS returned+5.0%TSLA −10.1% ×1 implies+10.1%TSLS returned+5.0%

Performance, window by window

TSLR and TSLS over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
TSLRTSLSTSLRTSLSTSLRTSLS
1 month+21.1%−11.6%+23.2%−11.6%−2.1 pts−0.1 pts
3 months−27.7%+5.0%−20.2%+10.1%−7.5 pts−5.1 pts
6 months−27.7%−2.1%−13.2%+6.6%−14.5 pts−8.7 pts
1 year−29.7%−12.6%−1.8%+0.9%−27.9 pts−13.5 pts
3 years−46.8%−66.4%+73.2%−36.6%−120.1 pts−29.8 pts
Since launch−34.0%−74.2%+113.4%−29.0%−147.4 pts−45.3 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
TSLR and TSLS on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
TSLR
GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of Tesla (TSLA)
TSLS
Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF
Aims to return 1 times the opposite of the daily move of Tesla (TSLA)
IssuerGraniteSharesDirexion
Sets out to return+2x-1x
OnTSLATSLA
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months−27.7%+5.0%
Underlying returned, 3 months−10.1%−10.1%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months−20.2%+10.1%
Difference from stated, 3 months−7.5 pts−5.1 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−29.7%−12.6%
Difference from stated, over that window−27.9 pts−13.5 pts
Underlying volatility56%56%
Difference over the days both have traded−2.1 ptsno shared window
Expense ratio0.95%not published
LaunchedAug 22, 2023Aug 9, 2022

TSLR in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: TSLR returned −27.7% where its own daily promise gave −25.7%, 2.0 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times TSLA's −10.1% implies −20.2%, which makes TSLR look 7.5 points short. 5.6 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. TSLR aims to return +2 times TSLA's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. TSLA moved at 56% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

TSLS in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: TSLS returned +5.0% where its own daily promise gave +2.9%, 2.1 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −1 times TSLA's −10.1% implies +10.1%, which makes TSLS look 5.1 points short. 7.2 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −1 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. TSLS aims to return -1 times TSLA's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -1 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, TSLR or TSLS?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, TSLR finished 7.5 points from what its multiple implies and TSLS finished 5.1 points from its own, so TSLS came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are TSLR and TSLS levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Tesla, TSLR at +2 times and TSLS at -1 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, TSLR or TSLS?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window TSLR’s moved at 56% annualized and TSLS’s at 56%, so TSLR has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold TSLR or TSLS for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

TSLR against TSLS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, TSLR against TSLS, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/TSLR-TSLS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources