Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

TSLS vs TSLZ: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, TSLS finished 2.1 points over and TSLZ 0.7 points over.

Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF and T-REX 2X INVERSE TESLA DAILY TARGET ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

+5.0%TSLS returned, 3 months
−1.0%TSLZ returned, 3 months
−5.1 ptsTSLS from its stated multiple
−21.2 ptsTSLZ from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: TSLS scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

TSLS 66.9TSLZ 24.40.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

A percentile among the 121 inverse ETFs over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

TSLS5.1 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
TSLA −10.1% ×1 implies+10.1%TSLS returned+5.0%TSLA −10.1% ×1 implies+10.1%TSLS returned+5.0%
TSLZ21.2 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
TSLA −10.1% ×2 implies+20.2%TSLZ returned−1.0%TSLA −10.1% ×2 implies+20.2%TSLZ returned−1.0%

Performance, window by window

TSLS and TSLZ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
TSLSTSLZTSLSTSLZTSLSTSLZ
1 month−11.6%−24.6%−11.6%−23.2%−0.1 pts−1.4 pts
3 months+5.0%−1.0%+10.1%+20.2%−5.1 pts−21.2 pts
6 months−2.1%−20.6%+6.6%+13.2%−8.7 pts−33.8 pts
1 year−12.6%−46.6%+0.9%+1.8%−13.5 pts−48.4 pts
3 years−66.4%not published−36.6%not published−29.8 ptsnot published
Since launch−74.2%−98.1%−29.0%−132.1%−45.3 pts+34.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
TSLS and TSLZ on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
TSLS
Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF
Aims to return 1 times the opposite of the daily move of Tesla (TSLA)
TSLZ
T-REX 2X INVERSE TESLA DAILY TARGET ETF
Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of Tesla (TSLA)
IssuerDirexionT-REX
Sets out to return-1x-2x
OnTSLATSLA
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months+5.0%−1.0%
Underlying returned, 3 months−10.1%−10.1%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months+10.1%+20.2%
Difference from stated, 3 months−5.1 pts−21.2 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−12.6%−46.6%
Difference from stated, over that window−13.5 pts−48.4 pts
Underlying volatility56%56%
Difference over the days both have tradedno shared window−21.2 pts
Expense rationot published1.05%
LaunchedAug 9, 2022Oct 19, 2023

TSLS in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: TSLS returned +5.0% where its own daily promise gave +2.9%, 2.1 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −1 times TSLA's −10.1% implies +10.1%, which makes TSLS look 5.1 points short. 7.2 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −1 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. TSLS aims to return -1 times TSLA's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -1 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. TSLA moved at 56% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

TSLZ in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: TSLZ returned −1.0% where its own daily promise gave −1.7%, 0.7 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times TSLA's −10.1% implies +20.2%, which makes TSLZ look 21.2 points short. 21.9 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. TSLZ aims to return -2 times TSLA's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, TSLS or TSLZ?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, TSLS finished 5.1 points from what its multiple implies and TSLZ finished 21.2 points from its own, so TSLS came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are TSLS and TSLZ levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Tesla, TSLS at -1 times and TSLZ at -2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, TSLS or TSLZ?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window TSLS’s moved at 56% annualized and TSLZ’s at 56%, so TSLS has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold TSLS or TSLZ for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

TSLS against TSLZ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, TSLS against TSLZ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/TSLS-TSLZ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources