Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

TSLL vs TSLZ: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, TSLL finished 2.2 points short and TSLZ 0.7 points over.

Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF and T-REX 2X INVERSE TESLA DAILY TARGET ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−27.9%TSLL returned, 3 months
−1.0%TSLZ returned, 3 months
−7.7 ptsTSLL from its stated multiple
−21.2 ptsTSLZ from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: TSLL scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

TSLL 64.6TSLZ 24.40.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 391 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

TSLL7.7 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
TSLA −10.1% ×2 implies−20.2%TSLL returned−27.9%TSLA −10.1% ×2 implies−20.2%TSLL returned−27.9%
TSLZ21.2 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
TSLA −10.1% ×2 implies+20.2%TSLZ returned−1.0%TSLA −10.1% ×2 implies+20.2%TSLZ returned−1.0%

Performance, window by window

TSLL and TSLZ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
TSLLTSLZTSLLTSLZTSLLTSLZ
1 month+20.6%−24.6%+23.2%−23.2%−2.5 pts−1.4 pts
3 months−27.9%−1.0%−20.2%+20.2%−7.7 pts−21.2 pts
6 months−28.3%−20.6%−13.2%+13.2%−15.2 pts−33.8 pts
1 year−30.8%−46.6%−1.8%+1.8%−29.0 pts−48.4 pts
3 years−35.3%not published+73.2%not published−108.5 ptsnot published
Since launch−52.7%−98.1%+58.0%−132.1%−110.7 pts+34.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
TSLL and TSLZ on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
TSLL
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of Tesla (TSLA)
TSLZ
T-REX 2X INVERSE TESLA DAILY TARGET ETF
Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of Tesla (TSLA)
IssuerDirexionT-REX
Sets out to return+2x-2x
OnTSLATSLA
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months−27.9%−1.0%
Underlying returned, 3 months−10.1%−10.1%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months−20.2%+20.2%
Difference from stated, 3 months−7.7 pts−21.2 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−30.8%−46.6%
Difference from stated, over that window−29.0 pts−48.4 pts
Underlying volatility56%56%
Difference over the days both have traded−2.5 pts−21.2 pts
Expense ratio0.83%1.05%
LaunchedAug 9, 2022Oct 19, 2023

TSLL in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: TSLL returned −27.9% where its own daily promise gave −25.7%, 2.2 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times TSLA's −10.1% implies −20.2%, which makes TSLL look 7.7 points short. 5.6 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. TSLL aims to return +2 times TSLA's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. TSLA moved at 56% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

TSLZ in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: TSLZ returned −1.0% where its own daily promise gave −1.7%, 0.7 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times TSLA's −10.1% implies +20.2%, which makes TSLZ look 21.2 points short. 21.9 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. TSLZ aims to return -2 times TSLA's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, TSLL or TSLZ?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, TSLL finished 7.7 points from what its multiple implies and TSLZ finished 21.2 points from its own, so TSLL came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are TSLL and TSLZ levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Tesla, TSLL at +2 times and TSLZ at -2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, TSLL or TSLZ?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window TSLL’s moved at 56% annualized and TSLZ’s at 56%, so TSLL has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold TSLL or TSLZ for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, TSLL or TSLZ?
TSLL charges 0.83% a year and TSLZ charges 1.05%, so TSLL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

TSLL against TSLZ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, TSLL against TSLZ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/TSLL-TSLZ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources