Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

TSLG vs TSLL: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, TSLG finished 2.4 points from its stated multiple and TSLL 2.5.

Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF and Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−27.9%TSLG returned, 3 months
−27.9%TSLL returned, 3 months
−7.8 ptsTSLG from its stated multiple
−7.7 ptsTSLL from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: TSLL scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

TSLG 62.3TSLL 64.60.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 391 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

TSLG7.8 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
TSLA −10.1% ×2 implies−20.2%TSLG returned−27.9%TSLA −10.1% ×2 implies−20.2%TSLG returned−27.9%
TSLL7.7 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
TSLA −10.1% ×2 implies−20.2%TSLL returned−27.9%TSLA −10.1% ×2 implies−20.2%TSLL returned−27.9%

Performance, window by window

TSLG and TSLL over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
TSLGTSLLTSLGTSLLTSLGTSLL
1 month+20.8%+20.6%+23.2%+23.2%−2.4 pts−2.5 pts
3 months−27.9%−27.9%−20.2%−20.2%−7.8 pts−7.7 pts
6 months−28.4%−28.3%−13.2%−13.2%−15.2 pts−15.2 pts
1 year−30.9%−30.8%−1.8%−1.8%−29.1 pts−29.0 pts
3 yearsnot published−35.3%not published+73.2%not published−108.5 pts
Since launch−68.4%−52.7%−32.5%+58.0%−36.0 pts−110.7 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
TSLG and TSLL on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
TSLG
Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of Tesla (TSLA)
TSLL
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of Tesla (TSLA)
IssuerLeverage SharesDirexion
Sets out to return+2x+2x
OnTSLATSLA
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months−27.9%−27.9%
Underlying returned, 3 months−10.1%−10.1%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months−20.2%−20.2%
Difference from stated, 3 months−7.8 pts−7.7 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−30.9%−30.8%
Difference from stated, over that window−29.1 pts−29.0 pts
Underlying volatility56%56%
Difference over the days both have traded−2.4 pts−2.5 pts
Expense ratio0.80%0.83%
LaunchedDec 13, 2024Aug 9, 2022

TSLG in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: TSLG returned −27.9% where its own daily promise gave −25.7%, 2.2 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times TSLA's −10.1% implies −20.2%, which makes TSLG look 7.8 points short. 5.6 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. TSLG aims to return +2 times TSLA's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. TSLA moved at 56% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

TSLL in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: TSLL returned −27.9% where its own daily promise gave −25.7%, 2.2 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times TSLA's −10.1% implies −20.2%, which makes TSLL look 7.7 points short. TSLL aims to return +2 times TSLA's move each day, then resets.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, TSLG or TSLL?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, TSLG finished 7.8 points from what its multiple implies and TSLL finished 7.7 points from its own, so TSLL came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are TSLG and TSLL levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Tesla, TSLG at +2 times and TSLL at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, TSLG or TSLL?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window TSLG’s moved at 56% annualized and TSLL’s at 56%, so TSLG has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold TSLG or TSLL for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, TSLG or TSLL?
TSLG charges 0.80% a year and TSLL charges 0.83%, so TSLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

TSLG against TSLL, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, TSLG against TSLL, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/TSLG-TSLL Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources