Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

TSLL vs TSLR: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, TSLL finished 2.5 points from its stated multiple and TSLR 2.1.

Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF and GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−27.9%TSLL returned, 3 months
−27.7%TSLR returned, 3 months
−7.7 ptsTSLL from its stated multiple
−7.5 ptsTSLR from its stated multiple

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score: TSLR scores higher

Did it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

TSLL 64.6TSLR 71.50.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 391 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

TSLL7.7 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
TSLA −10.1% ×2 implies−20.2%TSLL returned−27.9%TSLA −10.1% ×2 implies−20.2%TSLL returned−27.9%
TSLR7.5 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
TSLA −10.1% ×2 implies−20.2%TSLR returned−27.7%TSLA −10.1% ×2 implies−20.2%TSLR returned−27.7%

Performance, window by window

TSLL and TSLR over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
TSLLTSLRTSLLTSLRTSLLTSLR
1 month+20.6%+21.1%+23.2%+23.2%−2.5 pts−2.1 pts
3 months−27.9%−27.7%−20.2%−20.2%−7.7 pts−7.5 pts
6 months−28.3%−27.7%−13.2%−13.2%−15.2 pts−14.5 pts
1 year−30.8%−29.7%−1.8%−1.8%−29.0 pts−27.9 pts
3 years−35.3%−46.8%+73.2%+73.2%−108.5 pts−120.1 pts
Since launch−52.7%−34.0%+58.0%+113.4%−110.7 pts−147.4 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
TSLL and TSLR on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
TSLL
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of Tesla (TSLA)
TSLR
GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of Tesla (TSLA)
IssuerDirexionGraniteShares
Sets out to return+2x+2x
OnTSLATSLA
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months−27.9%−27.7%
Underlying returned, 3 months−10.1%−10.1%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months−20.2%−20.2%
Difference from stated, 3 months−7.7 pts−7.5 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−30.8%−29.7%
Difference from stated, over that window−29.0 pts−27.9 pts
Underlying volatility56%56%
Difference over the days both have traded−2.5 pts−2.1 pts
Expense ratio0.83%0.95%
LaunchedAug 9, 2022Aug 22, 2023

TSLL in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: TSLL returned −27.9% where its own daily promise gave −25.7%, 2.2 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times TSLA's −10.1% implies −20.2%, which makes TSLL look 7.7 points short. 5.6 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. TSLL aims to return +2 times TSLA's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. TSLA moved at 56% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

TSLR in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: TSLR returned −27.7% where its own daily promise gave −25.7%, 2.0 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times TSLA's −10.1% implies −20.2%, which makes TSLR look 7.5 points short. TSLR aims to return +2 times TSLA's move each day, then resets.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, TSLL or TSLR?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, TSLL finished 7.7 points from what its multiple implies and TSLR finished 7.5 points from its own, so TSLR came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are TSLL and TSLR levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Tesla, TSLL at +2 times and TSLR at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, TSLL or TSLR?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window TSLL’s moved at 56% annualized and TSLR’s at 56%, so TSLL has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold TSLL or TSLR for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, TSLL or TSLR?
TSLL charges 0.83% a year and TSLR charges 0.95%, so TSLL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

TSLL against TSLR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, TSLL against TSLR, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/TSLL-TSLR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources