Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

TESC vs TSLG: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, TESC finished 2.4 points from its stated multiple and TSLG 2.4.

Corgi TSLA 2x Daily ETF and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−31.6%TESC returned, 3 months
−27.9%TSLG returned, 3 months
−5.4 ptsTESC from its stated multiple
−7.8 ptsTSLG from its stated multiple
TESC2.4 pts short of its label · 1 month to Sep 11, 2026
TSLA +11.6% ×2 implies+23.2%TESC returned+20.7%TSLA +11.6% ×2 implies+23.2%TESC returned+20.7%
TSLG7.8 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
TSLA −10.1% ×2 implies−20.2%TSLG returned−27.9%TSLA −10.1% ×2 implies−20.2%TSLG returned−27.9%

Performance, window by window

TESC and TSLG over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
TESCTSLGTESCTSLGTESCTSLG
1 month+20.7%+20.8%+23.2%+23.2%−2.4 pts−2.4 pts
3 monthsnot published−27.9%not published−20.2%not published−7.8 pts
6 monthsnot published−28.4%not published−13.2%not published−15.2 pts
1 yearnot published−30.9%not published−1.8%not published−29.1 pts
Since launch−31.6%−68.4%−26.2%−32.5%−5.4 pts−36.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
TESC and TSLG on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
TESC
Corgi TSLA 2x Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of Tesla (TSLA)
TSLG
Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of Tesla (TSLA)
IssuerCorgiLeverage Shares
Sets out to return+2x+2x
OnTSLATSLA
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months+20.7%−27.9%
Underlying returned, 3 months+11.6%−10.1%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months+23.2%−20.2%
Difference from stated, 3 months−2.4 pts−7.8 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−31.6%−30.9%
Difference from stated, over that window−5.4 pts−29.1 pts
Underlying volatility50%56%
Difference over the days both have traded−2.4 pts−2.4 pts
Expense ratio0.45%0.80%
LaunchedJun 30, 2026Dec 13, 2024

TESC in plain words

One month to Sep 11, 2026: TESC returned +20.7% where its own daily promise gave +22.0%, 1.2 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times TSLA's 11.6% implies +23.2%, which makes TESC look 2.4 points short. 1.2 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. TESC aims to return +2 times TSLA's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. TSLA moved at 50% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

TSLG in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: TSLG returned −27.9% where its own daily promise gave −25.7%, 2.2 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times TSLA's −10.1% implies −20.2%, which makes TSLG look 7.8 points short. 5.6 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. TSLG aims to return +2 times TSLA's move each day, then resets. TSLA moved at 56% annualized over that window.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, TESC or TSLG?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, TESC finished 2.4 points from what its multiple implies and TSLG finished 7.8 points from its own, so TESC came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are TESC and TSLG levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Tesla, TESC at +2 times and TSLG at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, TESC or TSLG?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window TESC’s moved at 50% annualized and TSLG’s at 56%, so TSLG has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold TESC or TSLG for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, TESC or TSLG?
TESC charges 0.45% a year and TSLG charges 0.80%, so TESC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

TESC against TSLG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, TESC against TSLG, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/TESC-TSLG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources