Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

TESC vs TSLS: which held to its multiple?

Over a month against its own daily promise, TESC finished 1.2 points short and TSLS 0.6 points over.

Corgi TSLA 2x Daily ETF and Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF, side by side, leveraged ETFs on ETFIQ.

−31.6%TESC returned, 3 months
+5.0%TSLS returned, 3 months
−5.4 ptsTESC from its stated multiple
−5.1 ptsTSLS from its stated multiple
TESC2.4 pts short of its label · 1 month to Sep 11, 2026
TSLA +11.6% ×2 implies+23.2%TESC returned+20.7%TSLA +11.6% ×2 implies+23.2%TESC returned+20.7%
TSLS5.1 pts short of its label · 3 months to Sep 11, 2026
TSLA −10.1% ×1 implies+10.1%TSLS returned+5.0%TSLA −10.1% ×1 implies+10.1%TSLS returned+5.0%

Performance, window by window

TESC and TSLS over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnMultiple would giveDifference
TESCTSLSTESCTSLSTESCTSLS
1 month+20.7%−11.6%+23.2%−11.6%−2.4 pts−0.1 pts
3 monthsnot published+5.0%not published+10.1%not published−5.1 pts
6 monthsnot published−2.1%not published+6.6%not published−8.7 pts
1 yearnot published−12.6%not published+0.9%not published−13.5 pts
3 yearsnot published−66.4%not published−36.6%not published−29.8 pts
Since launch−31.6%−74.2%−26.2%−29.0%−5.4 pts−45.3 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
TESC and TSLS on the same fields, as of Sep 11, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
TESC
Corgi TSLA 2x Daily ETF
Aims to return twice the daily move of Tesla (TSLA)
TSLS
Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF
Aims to return 1 times the opposite of the daily move of Tesla (TSLA)
IssuerCorgiDirexion
Sets out to return+2x-1x
OnTSLATSLA
Segmentcompanycompany
Fund returned, 3 months+20.7%+5.0%
Underlying returned, 3 months+11.6%−10.1%
What the stated multiple implies, 3 months+23.2%+10.1%
Difference from stated, 3 months−2.4 pts−5.1 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch−31.6%−12.6%
Difference from stated, over that window−5.4 pts−13.5 pts
Underlying volatility50%56%
Difference over the days both have traded−2.4 ptsno shared window
Expense ratio0.45%not published
LaunchedJun 30, 2026Aug 9, 2022

TESC in plain words

One month to Sep 11, 2026: TESC returned +20.7% where its own daily promise gave +22.0%, 1.2 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and +2 times TSLA's 11.6% implies +23.2%, which makes TESC look 2.4 points short. 1.2 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any +2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. TESC aims to return +2 times TSLA's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. TSLA moved at 50% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

TSLS in plain words

Three months to Sep 11, 2026: TSLS returned +5.0% where its own daily promise gave +2.9%, 2.1 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −1 times TSLA's −10.1% implies +10.1%, which makes TSLS look 5.1 points short. 7.2 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −1 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. TSLS aims to return -1 times TSLA's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -1 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. TSLA moved at 56% annualized over that window.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, TESC or TSLS?
Over the window to Sep 11, 2026, TESC finished 2.4 points from what its multiple implies and TSLS finished 5.1 points from its own, so TESC came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are TESC and TSLS levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Tesla, TESC at +2 times and TSLS at -1 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, TESC or TSLS?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window TESC’s moved at 50% annualized and TSLS’s at 56%, so TSLS has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold TESC or TSLS for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

TESC against TSLS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 11, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, TESC against TSLS, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/TESC-TSLS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources