Data as of .
XBCI vs XRPM: which paid, and which earned it?
XBCI and XRPM both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, XBCI and XRPM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in XBCI | Only in XRPM |
|---|---|
| United States Treasury Bill 79.38% | XRPC 12/18/2026 11.25 C 27.22% |
| iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF 20.62% | Canary XRP ETF 26.37% |
| Invesco Government & Agency Portfolio 12 23.01% | |
| United States Treasury Bill 11/05/2026 8.34% | |
| United States Treasury Bill 11/24/2026 8.32% | |
| Cash & Other 6.98% | |
| United States Treasury Bill 11/19/2026 6.24% | |
| United States Treasury Bill 11/03/2026 4.17% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XBCI | XRPM | XBCI | XRPM | XBCI | XRPM | |
| 3 months | +32.2% | −3.8% | 10.1% | 8.3% | +3.0 pts | −1.6 pts |
| 6 months | +14.7% | −21.4% | 18.0% | 14.4% | −1.0 pts | −55.3 pts |
| Since launch | +3.7% | −48.5% | 21.3% | 15.6% | −2.5 pts | −76.3 pts |
| XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF Option income on IBIT, paying monthly | XRPM Amplify XRP 3 Monthly Premium Income ETF Covered call on BITQ, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | NEOS | Amplify |
| Strategy | option income | covered call |
| Benchmark | Bitcoin (IBIT) | Crypto industry (BITQ), used as the crypto proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 38.0% | 37.4% |
| Expense ratio | 0.98% | not published |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 21.3% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026) | 15.6% (since launch on Nov 18, 2025) |
| Price change, 1 year | −20.3% | −60.9% |
| Total return, 1 year | +3.7% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026) | −48.5% (since launch on Nov 18, 2025) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +6.3% | +27.9% |
| Ahead or behind | −2.5 pts | −76.3 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 95% | not published |
| Age | 227 days | 304 days |
| Net assets | $179m | $12m |
XBCI in plain words
Over the period since launch on Feb 3, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, XBCI paid 21.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 20.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.7%. Bitcoin (IBIT) returned +6.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 38.0%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 95% of the distribution paid Jul 10, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
XRPM in plain words
Over the period since launch on Nov 18, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, XRPM paid 15.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 60.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −48.5%. Crypto industry (BITQ), used as the crypto proxy returned +27.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 76.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 37.4%, paid monthly.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, XBCI against XRPM, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/xbci-vs-xrpm Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.