Data as of .
DYLG vs PBP: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year PBP paid 11.8% of its price in cash against DYLG’s 9.5%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: PBP scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DYLG and PBP hold 29% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DYLG | PBP |
|---|---|---|
| MICROSOFT CORP | 5.70% | 5.57% |
| APPLE INC | 3.88% | 7.50% |
| ALPHABET INC-CL A | 4.04% | 3.11% |
| AMAZON.COM INC | 2.93% | 3.77% |
| NVIDIA CORP | 2.57% | 8.18% |
| JPMORGAN CHASE & CO | 4.04% | 1.42% |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON | 3.12% | 0.99% |
| VISA INC-CLASS A SHARES | 4.25% | 0.93% |
| WALMART INC | 1.23% | 0.71% |
| CISCO SYSTEMS INC | 1.26% | 0.66% |
| CHEVRON CORP | 2.42% | 0.59% |
| CATERPILLAR INC | 9.35% | 0.56% |
| Only in DYLG | Only in PBP |
|---|---|
| CASH 0.27% | Broadcom Inc 2.57% |
| OTHER PAYABLE & RECEIVABLES -0.15% | Alphabet Inc 2.47% |
| DJX US 10/16/26 C520 -0.56% | Meta Platforms Inc 2.22% |
| Micron Technology Inc 1.74% | |
| Tesla Inc 1.56% | |
| Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.42% | |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc 1.39% | |
| Eli Lilly & Co 1.38% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 19, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DYLG | PBP | DYLG | PBP | DYLG | PBP | |
| 3 months | +1.9% | +5.0% | 0.8% | 2.8% | +1.5 pts | +2.7 pts |
| 6 months | +13.0% | +13.0% | 2.1% | 5.7% | −0.9 pts | −5.0 pts |
| 1 year | +13.8% | +18.5% | 9.5% | 11.8% | +0.3 pts | +1.9 pts |
| 3 years | +47.0% | +46.1% | 30.8% | 31.8% | −9.8 pts | −32.3 pts |
| Since launch | +44.7% | +199.0% | 30.7% | 101.2% | −8.3 pts | −604.5 pts |
| DYLG Global X Dow 30 Covered Call & Growth ETF Covered call on DIA, paying monthly | PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Global X | Invesco |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 3.1% | 11.3% |
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.29% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 9.5% | 11.8% |
| Price change, 1 year | +3.5% | +5.5% |
| Total return, 1 year | +13.8% | +18.5% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +13.5% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | +0.3 pts | +1.9 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 59% | not published |
| Age | 1150 days | 6101 days |
| Net assets | $6m | $386m |
DYLG in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DYLG paid 9.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.8%. Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) returned +13.5% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 3.1%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 59% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
PBP in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, PBP paid 11.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 5.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 11.3%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, DYLG or PBP?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DYLG paid 9.5% of its starting price in cash and PBP paid 11.8%, so PBP paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, DYLG or PBP?
- With every distribution reinvested, DYLG returned +13.8% and PBP returned +18.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so PBP returned more.
- Which is cheaper, DYLG or PBP?
- DYLG charges 0.35% a year and PBP charges 0.29%, so PBP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DYLG against PBP, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dylg-vs-pbp Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.