Data as of .
PBP vs QYLG: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year QYLG paid 17.4% of its price in cash against PBP’s 11.8%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: PBP scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, PBP and QYLG hold 55% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | PBP | QYLG |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp | 8.18% | 8.44% |
| Apple Inc | 7.50% | 7.73% |
| Microsoft Corp | 5.57% | 5.77% |
| Amazon.com Inc | 3.77% | 4.31% |
| Alphabet Inc | 3.11% | 3.23% |
| Broadcom Inc | 2.57% | 2.67% |
| Alphabet Inc | 2.47% | 3.00% |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 2.22% | 3.11% |
| Micron Technology Inc | 1.74% | 4.99% |
| Tesla Inc | 1.56% | 3.01% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.39% | 3.97% |
| Intel Corp | 0.81% | 2.48% |
| Only in PBP | Only in QYLG |
|---|---|
| JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.42% | SPACE EXPLORATION TECHN-CL A 2.85% |
| Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.42% | ASML HOLDING NV-NY REG SHS 0.68% |
| Eli Lilly & Co 1.38% | SHOPIFY INC - CLASS A 0.67% |
| ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 1.03% | CASH 0.53% |
| Johnson & Johnson 0.99% | ARM HOLDINGS PLC-ADR 0.52% |
| Visa Inc 0.93% | MERCADOLIBRE INC 0.39% |
| AbbVie Inc 0.71% | STRATEGY INC- CL A 0.24% |
| Mastercard Inc 0.69% | ASTERA LABS INC 0.23% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 19, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PBP | QYLG | PBP | QYLG | PBP | QYLG | |
| 3 months | +5.0% | −0.1% | 2.8% | 2.1% | +2.7 pts | +2.4 pts |
| 6 months | +13.0% | +19.6% | 5.7% | 4.6% | −5.0 pts | −4.7 pts |
| 1 year | +18.5% | +22.2% | 11.8% | 17.4% | +1.9 pts | +0.5 pts |
| 3 years | +46.1% | +76.2% | 31.8% | 51.1% | −32.3 pts | −22.0 pts |
| Since launch | +199.0% | +122.0% | 101.2% | 75.3% | −604.5 pts | −52.0 pts |
| PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | QYLG Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Invesco | Global X |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 11.3% | 6.8% |
| Expense ratio | 0.29% | 0.35% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 11.8% | 17.4% |
| Price change, 1 year | +5.5% | +2.4% |
| Total return, 1 year | +18.5% | +22.2% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +16.6% | +21.8% |
| Ahead or behind | +1.9 pts | +0.5 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 96% |
| Age | 6101 days | 2187 days |
| Net assets | $386m | $175m |
PBP in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, PBP paid 11.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 5.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 11.3%, paid monthly.
QYLG in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QYLG paid 17.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +22.2%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.8%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 96% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, PBP or QYLG?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, PBP paid 11.8% of its starting price in cash and QYLG paid 17.4%, so QYLG paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, PBP or QYLG?
- With every distribution reinvested, PBP returned +18.5% and QYLG returned +22.2% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so QYLG returned more.
- Which is cheaper, PBP or QYLG?
- PBP charges 0.29% a year and QYLG charges 0.35%, so PBP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, PBP against QYLG, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/pbp-vs-qylg Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.