Data as of .
ACSP vs PBP: which paid, and which earned it?
ACSP and PBP both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACSP and PBP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in ACSP | Only in PBP |
|---|---|
| S&P500 FUTURES 35% AUTOCALL SWAP BANK OF AMERICA NA 100.00% | NVIDIA Corp 8.18% |
| Apple Inc 7.50% | |
| Microsoft Corp 5.57% | |
| Amazon.com Inc 3.77% | |
| Alphabet Inc 3.11% | |
| Broadcom Inc 2.57% | |
| Alphabet Inc 2.47% | |
| Meta Platforms Inc 2.22% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 19, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACSP | PBP | ACSP | PBP | ACSP | PBP | |
| 3 months | not published | +5.0% | not published | 2.8% | not published | +2.7 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +13.0% | not published | 5.7% | not published | −5.0 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +18.5% | not published | 11.8% | not published | +1.9 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +46.1% | not published | 31.8% | not published | −32.3 pts |
| Since launch | −3.8% | +199.0% | 0.0% | 101.2% | −2.1 pts | −604.5 pts |
| ACSP ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF Option income on SPY | PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | ProShares | Invesco |
| Strategy | option income | covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | not established | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | not published | 11.3% |
| Expense ratio | 0.72% | 0.29% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 0.0% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) | 11.8% |
| Price change, 1 year | −3.8% | +5.5% |
| Total return, 1 year | −3.8% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) | +18.5% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | −1.6% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −2.1 pts | +1.9 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 35 days | 6101 days |
| Net assets | $27m | $386m |
ACSP in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, ACSP paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.8%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned −1.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.1 pts.
PBP in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, PBP paid 11.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 5.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 11.3%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, ACSP or PBP?
- ACSP charges 0.72% a year and PBP charges 0.29%, so PBP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACSP against PBP, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-pbp Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.