Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
ACSP vs PBP: Dividend Yield & Total Return
ACSP and PBP both write options for income.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about ACSP and PBP
Net assets: $57m on Nov 4, 2026 for ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF, and $389m on Nov 3, 2026 for Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF.
5.8 pts behind SPY
ACSP since launch: paid 10.4%, price −16.9%, total −6.8%, SPY −1.0%, −5.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SPY
−1.0%
ACSP
−6.8%
5.8 pts behind SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
5.8 pts behind SPY
ACSP since launch: paid 10.4%, price −16.9%, total −6.8%, SPY −1.0%, −5.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SPY
−1.0%
ACSP
−6.8%
5.8 pts behind SPY
10.4% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACSP since launch: paid 10.4%, price −16.9%, total −6.8%, SPY −1.0%, −5.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.1.4 pts ahead of SPY
PBP over 1 year: paid 11.7%, price +3.6%, total +16.2%, SPY +14.8%, +1.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SPY
+14.8%
PBP
+16.2%
11.7% of it arrived as cash
1.4 pts ahead of SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
1.4 pts ahead of SPY
PBP over 1 year: paid 11.7%, price +3.6%, total +16.2%, SPY +14.8%, +1.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SPY
+14.8%
PBP
+16.2%
1.4 pts ahead of SPY
11.7% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. PBP over 1 year: paid 11.7%, price +3.6%, total +16.2%, SPY +14.8%, +1.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
PBP costs 0.43 points a year less; PBP is 7.1 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | ACSP | PBP |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | not published | +16.2% |
| Price change | fell 16.9% (since Aug 14, 2026) | rose 3.6% (1 year) |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 98% of the Nov 6, 2026 payment | 95% of the Oct 23, 2026 payment |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | S&P 500, measured through SPY | S&P 500, measured through SPY |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.72% | 0.29% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $55m | $389m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, ACSP and PBP hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ACSP | PBP | ACSP | PBP | ACSP | PBP |
| 3 months | – | +2.5% | – | 2.5% | – | +2.6 pts |
| 6 months | – | +8.1% | – | 5.3% | – | +3.1 pts |
| 1 year | – | +16.2% | – | 11.7% | – | +1.4 pts |
| 3 years | – | +49.6% | – | 33.4% | – | −33.3 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: ACSP Aug 2026 · PBP Dec 2007 | −6.8% | +172.0% | 10.4% | 92.4% | −5.8 pts | −467.6 pts |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
ACSP
Over the period from its first trade on Aug 14, 2026 to Nov 4, 2026, ACSP paid 10.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 16.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −6.8%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned −1.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.8 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.5%, paid periodically. ProShares estimates that 98% of the distribution paid Nov 6, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
PBP
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, PBP paid 11.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.2%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.4 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.5%, paid monthly. Invesco estimates that 95% of the distribution paid Oct 23, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ACSP against PBP, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-pbp
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). ACSP against PBP. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-pbp
[ACSP against PBP (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-pbp)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.