Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

DOGG vs MAGY: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year MAGY paid 26.5% of its price in cash against DOGG’s 9.6%, though DOGG returned more with it reinvested.

FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF and Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF.

9.6%DOGG cash paid, 1 year
26.5%MAGY cash paid, 1 year
+18.1%DOGG total return, 1 year
+1.8%MAGY total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: DOGG scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

DOGG 88.8MAGY 22.63.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

DOGG4.6 pts ahead of DIA · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
DIA+13.5%DOGG+18.1%9.6% of it arrived as cash4.6 pts ahead of DIATotal return, distributions reinvestedDIA+13.5%DOGG+18.1%9.6% cash4.6 pts ahead of DIA
MAGY9.4 pts behind MAGS · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
MAGS+11.2%MAGY+1.8%9.4 pts behind MAGSTotal return, distributions reinvestedMAGS+11.2%MAGY+1.8%9.4 pts behind MAGS

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DOGG and MAGY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in DOGGOnly in MAGY
U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 01/21/2027 69.94%Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF 100.02%
Merck & Co., Inc. 7.18%First American Government Obligations Fu 0.36%
The Procter & Gamble Company 6.47%MAGS 09/25/2026 71.37 C -0.38%
Amgen Inc. 6.33%
Chevron Corporation 5.81%
Verizon Communications Inc. 5.55%
The Coca-Cola Company 5.47%
McDonald's Corporation 4.92%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

DOGG and MAGY over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
DOGGMAGYDOGGMAGYDOGGMAGY
3 months+2.5%+3.7%2.3%6.1%+2.1 pts−3.9 pts
6 months+3.9%+8.1%4.5%12.9%−10.1 pts−12.7 pts
1 year+18.1%+1.8%9.6%26.5%+4.6 pts−9.4 pts
3 years+40.2%not published28.0%not published−16.7 ptsnot published
Since launch+43.7%+25.6%30.9%42.0%−17.9 pts−37.5 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
DOGG and MAGY on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DOGG
FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF
Option income on DIA, paying monthly
MAGY
Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF
Covered call on MAGS, paying weekly
IssuerFirst TrustRoundhill
Strategyoption incomecovered call
BenchmarkDow Jones Industrial Average (DIA)Magnificent Seven (MAGS)
Paysmonthlyweekly
Payout rate, annualized9.1%19.2%
Expense ratio0.75%0.99%
Cash paid, 1 year9.6%26.5%
Price change, 1 year+8.0%−25.3%
Total return, 1 year+18.1%+1.8%
Benchmark return, 1 year+13.5%+11.2%
Ahead or behind+4.6 pts−9.4 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age1240 days513 days
Net assets$87m$102m

DOGG in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DOGG paid 9.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 8.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.1%. Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) returned +13.5% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 9.1%, paid monthly.

MAGY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, MAGY paid 26.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 25.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.8%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +11.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.4 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 19.2%, paid weekly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, DOGG or MAGY?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, DOGG paid 9.6% of its starting price in cash and MAGY paid 26.5%, so MAGY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, DOGG or MAGY?
With every distribution reinvested, DOGG returned +18.1% and MAGY returned +1.8% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so DOGG returned more.
Which is cheaper, DOGG or MAGY?
DOGG charges 0.75% a year and MAGY charges 0.99%, so DOGG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DOGG against MAGY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DOGG against MAGY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dogg-vs-magy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources