Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
DOGG vs MAGY: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, MAGY paid 24.0% of its price in cash against DOGG’s 9.7%, though DOGG returned more with it reinvested.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about DOGG and MAGY
Net assets: $96m on Nov 3, 2026 for FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF, and $94m on Nov 4, 2026 for Roundhill Magnificent Seven Covered Call ETF.
12 pts ahead of DIA
DOGG over 1 year: paid 9.7%, price +16.1%, total +26.9%, DIA +14.9%, +12.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
DIA
+14.9%
DOGG
+26.9%
9.7% of it arrived as cash
12 pts ahead of DIA
Total return, distributions reinvested
12 pts ahead of DIA
DOGG over 1 year: paid 9.7%, price +16.1%, total +26.9%, DIA +14.9%, +12.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
DIA
+14.9%
DOGG
+26.9%
12 pts ahead of DIA
9.7% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. DOGG over 1 year: paid 9.7%, price +16.1%, total +26.9%, DIA +14.9%, +12.0 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.7.8 pts behind MAGS
MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
MAGS
+6.3%
MAGY
−1.5%
7.8 pts behind MAGS
Total return, distributions reinvested
7.8 pts behind MAGS
MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
MAGS
+6.3%
MAGY
−1.5%
7.8 pts behind MAGS
24.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. MAGY over 1 year: paid 24.0%, price −26.1%, total −1.5%, MAGS +6.3%, −7.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
DOGG costs 0.24 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 28.4 points.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | DOGG | MAGY |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +26.9% | −1.5% |
| Price change, 1 year | rose 16.1% | fell 26.1% |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 0% of the Oct 30, 2026 payment | 100% of the Nov 2, 2026 payment |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | Dow Jones Industrial Average, measured through DIA | Magnificent Seven, measured through MAGS |
| Against its benchmark, same days | ahead by 12.0 pts | behind by 7.8 pts |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.99% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $96m | $92m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed
One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, DOGG and MAGY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | DOGG | MAGY | DOGG | MAGY | DOGG | MAGY |
| 3 months | +7.3% | +4.0% | 2.2% | 5.4% | +8.8 pts | +1.2 pts |
| 6 months | +13.7% | +0.8% | 4.5% | 11.3% | +6.2 pts | −1.8 pts |
| 1 year | +26.9% | −1.5% | 9.7% | 24.0% | +12.1 pts | −7.8 pts |
| 3 years | +55.7% | – | 28.9% | – | −8.5 pts | – |
| Since launchNot the same days: DOGG Apr 2023 · MAGY Apr 2025 | +57.4% | +25.7% | 32.5% | 44.0% | −9.6 pts | −37.0 pts |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
DOGG
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, DOGG paid 9.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 16.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +26.9%. Dow Jones Industrial Average (DIA) returned +14.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 12.0 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.4%, paid monthly. First Trust estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Oct 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
MAGY
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, MAGY paid 24.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 26.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −1.5%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +6.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.8 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 25.1%, paid weekly. Roundhill estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Nov 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, DOGG against MAGY, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dogg-vs-magy
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). DOGG against MAGY. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dogg-vs-magy
[DOGG against MAGY (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/dogg-vs-magy)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.