Data as of .
CHPY vs TYLG: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year CHPY paid 49.3% of its price in cash against TYLG’s 10.3%, and returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: CHPY scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CHPY and TYLG hold 20% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | CHPY | TYLG |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp | 6.59% | 7.30% |
| Broadcom Inc | 6.82% | 2.30% |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc | 4.30% | 2.24% |
| Micron Technology Inc | 3.81% | 2.06% |
| Intel Corp | 5.12% | 1.48% |
| Lam Research Corp | 4.95% | 0.99% |
| Applied Materials Inc | 3.17% | 0.96% |
| Texas Instruments Inc | 3.36% | 0.67% |
| KLA Corp | 3.83% | 0.63% |
| Marvell Technology Inc | 5.75% | 0.58% |
| QUALCOMM Inc | 3.17% | 0.52% |
| Analog Devices Inc | 3.44% | 0.50% |
| Only in CHPY | Only in TYLG |
|---|---|
| ARM Holdings PLC 4.63% | STATE STREET TECHNOLOGY SELECT SECTOR SP 54.45% |
| ASML Holding NV 3.94% | APPLE INC 6.66% |
| ASE Technology Holding Co Ltd 3.65% | MICROSOFT CORP 4.98% |
| STMicroelectronics NV 3.63% | CISCO SYSTEMS INC 1.18% |
| TSMC 3.54% | PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC-A 1.12% |
| United Microelectronics Corp 2.99% | PALO ALTO NETWORKS INC 0.81% |
| Lattice Semiconductor Corp 2.85% | CASH 0.73% |
| ACM Research Inc 2.54% | SANDISK CORP 0.71% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHPY | TYLG | CHPY | TYLG | CHPY | TYLG | |
| 3 months | −15.2% | +2.0% | 8.8% | 2.4% | −2.0 pts | +2.9 pts |
| 6 months | +48.5% | +29.6% | 27.5% | 5.7% | −0.5 pts | −10.8 pts |
| 1 year | +83.7% | +32.9% | 49.3% | 10.3% | +2.3 pts | −5.2 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +95.0% | not published | 34.2% | not published | −33.0 pts |
| Since launch | +164.7% | +141.1% | 79.7% | 45.8% | −29.2 pts | −51.3 pts |
| CHPY YieldMax(R) Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF Synthetic covered call on SMH, paying weekly | TYLG Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF Covered call on XLK, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | YieldMax | Global X |
| Strategy | synthetic covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | Semiconductors (SMH) | Technology sector (XLK) |
| Pays | weekly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 57.5% | 7.8% |
| Expense ratio | 1.03% | 0.60% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 49.3% | 10.3% |
| Price change, 1 year | +20.6% | +20.6% |
| Total return, 1 year | +83.7% | +32.9% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +81.3% | +38.0% |
| Ahead or behind | +2.3 pts | −5.2 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 100% | 100% |
| Age | 533 days | 1396 days |
| Net assets | $1.2bn | $15m |
CHPY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, CHPY paid 49.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 20.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +83.7%. Semiconductors (SMH) returned +81.3% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 2.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 57.5%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
TYLG in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, TYLG paid 10.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 20.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +32.9%. Technology sector (XLK) returned +38.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.8%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, CHPY or TYLG?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, CHPY paid 49.3% of its starting price in cash and TYLG paid 10.3%, so CHPY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, CHPY or TYLG?
- With every distribution reinvested, CHPY returned +83.7% and TYLG returned +32.9% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so CHPY returned more.
- Which is cheaper, CHPY or TYLG?
- CHPY charges 1.03% a year and TYLG charges 0.60%, so TYLG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CHPY against TYLG, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/chpy-vs-tylg Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.