Data as of .
CHPY vs FINY: which paid, and which earned it?
CHPY and FINY both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CHPY and FINY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in CHPY | Only in FINY |
|---|---|
| Broadcom Inc 6.82% | Treasury Bill 100.00% |
| NVIDIA Corp 6.59% | |
| Marvell Technology Inc 5.75% | |
| Intel Corp 5.12% | |
| Lam Research Corp 4.95% | |
| ARM Holdings PLC 4.63% | |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc 4.30% | |
| ASML Holding NV 3.94% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHPY | FINY | CHPY | FINY | CHPY | FINY | |
| 3 months | −15.2% | +5.0% | 8.8% | 4.2% | −2.0 pts | +0.4 pts |
| 6 months | +48.5% | not published | 27.5% | not published | −0.5 pts | not published |
| 1 year | +83.7% | not published | 49.3% | not published | +2.3 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +164.7% | +9.2% | 79.7% | 7.7% | −29.2 pts | +0.6 pts |
| CHPY YieldMax(R) Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF Synthetic covered call on SMH, paying weekly | FINY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Financials ETF Synthetic covered call on XLF, paying weekly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | YieldMax | GraniteShares |
| Strategy | synthetic covered call | synthetic covered call |
| Benchmark | Semiconductors (SMH) | Financials sector (XLF) |
| Pays | weekly | weekly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 57.5% | 11.2% |
| Expense ratio | 1.03% | 1.07% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 49.3% | 7.7% (since launch on May 5, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | +20.6% | +1.2% |
| Total return, 1 year | +83.7% | +9.2% (since launch on May 5, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +81.3% | +8.7% |
| Ahead or behind | +2.3 pts | +0.6 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | 100% | 96% |
| Age | 533 days | 136 days |
| Net assets | $1.2bn | $761,337 |
CHPY in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, CHPY paid 49.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 20.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +83.7%. Semiconductors (SMH) returned +81.3% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 2.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 57.5%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
FINY in plain words
Over the period since launch on May 5, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, FINY paid 7.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +9.2%. Financials sector (XLF) returned +8.7% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 0.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 11.2%, paid weekly. GraniteShares estimates that 96% of the distribution paid Jul 7, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, CHPY or FINY?
- CHPY charges 1.03% a year and FINY charges 1.07%, so CHPY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CHPY against FINY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/chpy-vs-finy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.