Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

CHPY vs TDVI: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year CHPY paid 49.3% of its price in cash against TDVI’s 8.1%, and returned more with it reinvested.

YieldMax(R) Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF and FT Vest Technology Dividend Target Income ETF.

49.3%CHPY cash paid, 1 year
8.1%TDVI cash paid, 1 year
+83.7%CHPY total return, 1 year
+17.1%TDVI total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: CHPY scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

CHPY 92.5TDVI 44.83.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

CHPY2.3 pts ahead of SMH · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SMH+81.3%CHPY+83.7%49.3% of it arrived as cash2.3 pts ahead of SMHTotal return, distributions reinvestedSMH+81.3%CHPY+83.7%49.3% cash2.3 pts ahead of SMH
TDVI20.9 pts behind XLK · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
XLK+38.0%TDVI+17.1%20.9 pts behind XLKTotal return, distributions reinvestedXLK+38.0%TDVI+17.1%20.9 pts behind XLK

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CHPY and TDVI hold 25% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions CHPY and TDVI both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingCHPYTDVI
Broadcom Inc6.82%7.77%
TSMC3.54%4.21%
Texas Instruments Inc3.36%8.22%
Analog Devices Inc3.44%3.19%
QUALCOMM Inc3.17%4.19%
NXP Semiconductors NV3.59%1.58%
Microchip Technology Inc3.21%1.50%
ASML Holding NV3.94%1.28%
ASE Technology Holding Co Ltd3.65%0.10%
STMicroelectronics NV3.63%0.10%
Only in each
Only in CHPYOnly in TDVI
NVIDIA Corp 6.59%Oracle Corporation 7.97%
Marvell Technology Inc 5.75%International Business Machines Corporat 7.90%
Intel Corp 5.12%Microsoft Corporation 7.83%
Lam Research Corp 4.95%Thomson Reuters Corporation 2.30%
ARM Holdings PLC 4.63%Vistance Networks Inc. 2.09%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 4.30%Cisco Systems, Inc. 1.99%
KLA Corp 3.83%Salesforce, Inc. 1.98%
Micron Technology Inc 3.81%AT&T Inc. 1.97%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

CHPY and TDVI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
CHPYTDVICHPYTDVICHPYTDVI
3 months−15.2%−2.9%8.8%1.9%−2.0 pts−2.1 pts
6 months+48.5%+21.2%27.5%4.5%−0.5 pts−19.2 pts
1 year+83.7%+17.1%49.3%8.1%+2.3 pts−20.9 pts
3 yearsnot published+101.3%not published31.3%not published−26.7 pts
Since launch+164.7%+101.0%79.7%31.3%−29.2 pts−29.0 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
CHPY and TDVI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CHPY
YieldMax(R) Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF
Synthetic covered call on SMH, paying weekly
TDVI
FT Vest Technology Dividend Target Income ETF
Dividend stocks with call overlay on XLK, paying monthly
IssuerYieldMaxFirst Trust
Strategysynthetic covered calldividend stocks with call overlay
BenchmarkSemiconductors (SMH)Technology sector (XLK)
Paysweeklymonthly
Payout rate, annualized57.5%7.9%
Expense ratio1.03%0.75%
Cash paid, 1 year49.3%8.1%
Price change, 1 year+20.6%+8.2%
Total return, 1 year+83.7%+17.1%
Benchmark return, 1 year+81.3%+38.0%
Ahead or behind+2.3 pts−20.9 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate100%not published
Age533 days1135 days
Net assets$1.2bn$631m

CHPY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, CHPY paid 49.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 20.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +83.7%. Semiconductors (SMH) returned +81.3% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 2.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 57.5%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

TDVI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, TDVI paid 8.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 8.2%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +17.1%. Technology sector (XLK) returned +38.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 20.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.9%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, CHPY or TDVI?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, CHPY paid 49.3% of its starting price in cash and TDVI paid 8.1%, so CHPY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, CHPY or TDVI?
With every distribution reinvested, CHPY returned +83.7% and TDVI returned +17.1% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so CHPY returned more.
Which is cheaper, CHPY or TDVI?
CHPY charges 1.03% a year and TDVI charges 0.75%, so TDVI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CHPY against TDVI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CHPY against TDVI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/chpy-vs-tdvi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources