ATCL vs MSR: which paid, and which earned it?

ATCL and MSR both write options for income. REX Autocallable Income ETF and GraniteShares Autocallable MSTR ETF.

7.9%
ATCL cash paid, since launch
5.2%
MSR cash paid, since launch
+5.0%
ATCL total return, since launch
−33.6%
MSR total return, since launch
ATCL · since launch to Sep 30, 20267 pts behind SPY
ATCL
+5.0%
SPY
+12.0%

7 pts behind SPY

ATCL since launch: paid 7.9%, price −3.0%, total +5.0%, SPY +12.0%, −7.0 pts.

SPY

+12.0%

ATCL

+5.0%

7 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

7 pts behind SPY

ATCL since launch: paid 7.9%, price −3.0%, total +5.0%, SPY +12.0%, −7.0 pts.

SPY

+12.0%

ATCL

+5.0%

7 pts behind SPY

7.9% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ATCL since launch: paid 7.9%, price −3.0%, total +5.0%, SPY +12.0%, −7.0 pts.

MSR · since launch to Sep 30, 202616.6 pts behind MSTR
MSR
−33.6%
MSTR
−17.0%

16.6 pts behind MSTR

MSR since launch: paid 5.2%, price −38.4%, total −33.6%, MSTR −17.0%, −16.6 pts.

MSTR

−17.0%

MSR

−33.6%

16.6 pts behind MSTR

Total return, distributions reinvested

16.6 pts behind MSTR

MSR since launch: paid 5.2%, price −38.4%, total −33.6%, MSTR −17.0%, −16.6 pts.

MSTR

−17.0%

MSR

−33.6%

16.6 pts behind MSTR

5.2% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +12.0%. MSR since launch: paid 5.2%, price −38.4%, total −33.6%, MSTR −17.0%, −16.6 pts.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ATCL and MSR hold 96% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

half

96% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding ATCL MSR
TREASURY BILL 95.94% 100.00%
Only in ATCL
The Laddered T-Bill ETF 4.06%
Only in MSR

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Performance, window by window

Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowATCLMSRATCLMSRATCLMSR
3 months+1.4%+14.9%3.4%4.1%−1.1 pts−49.0 pts
6 months+7.5%not published7.0%not published−9.5 ptsnot published
Since launch
ATCL Feb 2026 · MSR May 2026
+5.0%−33.6%7.9%5.2%−7.0 pts−16.6 pts

ATCL and MSR over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

ATCL
REX Autocallable Income ETF · Autocallable on SPY, paying monthly
MSR
GraniteShares Autocallable MSTR ETF · Autocallable on MSTR
Issuer REX GraniteShares
Strategy autocallable autocallable
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy MicroStrategy (MSTR)
Pays monthly not established
Payout rate, annualized 13.7% 44.3%
Expense ratio 0.65% 1.07%
Cash paid, 1 year 7.9% (since launch on Feb 18, 2026) 5.2% (since launch on May 12, 2026)
Price change, 1 year −3.0% −38.4%
Total return, 1 year +5.0% (since launch on Feb 18, 2026) −33.6% (since launch on May 12, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year +12.0% −17.0%
Ahead or behind −7.0 pts −16.6 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 77% 0%
Age 224 days 141 days
Net assets $48m $593,832

ATCL and MSR on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ATCL in plain words

Over the period since launch on Feb 18, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ATCL paid 7.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.0%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +12.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.0 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.7%, paid monthly. REX estimates that 77% of the distribution paid Aug 19, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

MSR in plain words

Over the period since launch on May 12, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, MSR paid 5.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 38.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −33.6%. MicroStrategy (MSTR) returned −17.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 16.6 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 44.3%, paid periodically. GraniteShares estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Jun 5, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ATCL or MSR?
ATCL charges 0.65% a year and MSR charges 1.07%, so ATCL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, ATCL against MSR, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/atcl-vs-msr

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.