ATC vs MSR: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the window both share ATC paid 10.8% of its price in cash against MSR’s 5.2%, and returned more with it reinvested. GraniteShares Autocallable COIN ETF and GraniteShares Autocallable MSTR ETF.

10.8%
ATC cash paid, since launch
5.2%
MSR cash paid, since launch
+14.8%
ATC total return, since launch
−33.6%
MSR total return, since launch
ATC · since launch to Sep 30, 202625 pts ahead of COIN
ATC
+14.8%
COIN
−10.2%

25 pts ahead of COIN

ATC since launch: paid 10.8%, price +1.9%, total +14.8%, COIN −10.2%, +25.0 pts.

COIN

−10.2%

ATC

+14.8%

10.8% as cash

25 pts ahead of COIN

Total return, distributions reinvested

25 pts ahead of COIN

ATC since launch: paid 10.8%, price +1.9%, total +14.8%, COIN −10.2%, +25.0 pts.

COIN

−10.2%

ATC

+14.8%

25 pts ahead of COIN

10.8% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ATC since launch: paid 10.8%, price +1.9%, total +14.8%, COIN −10.2%, +25.0 pts.

MSR · since launch to Sep 30, 202616.6 pts behind MSTR
MSR
−33.6%
MSTR
−17.0%

16.6 pts behind MSTR

MSR since launch: paid 5.2%, price −38.4%, total −33.6%, MSTR −17.0%, −16.6 pts.

MSTR

−17.0%

MSR

−33.6%

16.6 pts behind MSTR

Total return, distributions reinvested

16.6 pts behind MSTR

MSR since launch: paid 5.2%, price −38.4%, total −33.6%, MSTR −17.0%, −16.6 pts.

MSTR

−17.0%

MSR

−33.6%

16.6 pts behind MSTR

5.2% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +14.8%. MSR since launch: paid 5.2%, price −38.4%, total −33.6%, MSTR −17.0%, −16.6 pts.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ATC and MSR hold 100% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

half

100% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding ATC MSR
Treasury Bill 100.00% 100.00%
Only in ATC
Only in MSR

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Performance, window by window

Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowATCMSRATCMSRATCMSR
3 months+23.3%+14.9%6.2%4.1%+6.2 pts−49.0 pts
Since launch
ATC May 2026 · MSR May 2026
+14.8%−33.6%10.8%5.2%+25.0 pts−16.6 pts

ATC and MSR over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

ATC
GraniteShares Autocallable COIN ETF · Autocallable on COIN, paying monthly
MSR
GraniteShares Autocallable MSTR ETF · Autocallable on MSTR
Issuer GraniteShares GraniteShares
Strategy autocallable autocallable
Benchmark Coinbase (COIN) MicroStrategy (MSTR)
Pays monthly not established
Payout rate, annualized 36.1% 44.3%
Expense ratio 1.07% 1.07%
Cash paid, 1 year 10.8% (since launch on May 12, 2026) 5.2% (since launch on May 12, 2026)
Price change, 1 year +1.9% −38.4%
Total return, 1 year +14.8% (since launch on May 12, 2026) −33.6% (since launch on May 12, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year −10.2% −17.0%
Ahead or behind +25.0 pts −16.6 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 2% 0%
Age 141 days 141 days
Net assets $998,712 $593,832

ATC and MSR on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ATC in plain words

Over the period since launch on May 12, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ATC paid 10.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.8%. Coinbase (COIN) returned −10.2% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 25.0 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 36.1%, paid monthly. GraniteShares estimates that 2% of the distribution paid Aug 14, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

MSR in plain words

Over the period since launch on May 12, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, MSR paid 5.2% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 38.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −33.6%. MicroStrategy (MSTR) returned −17.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 16.6 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 44.3%, paid periodically. GraniteShares estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Jun 5, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, ATC or MSR?
Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, ATC paid 10.8% of its starting price in cash and MSR paid 5.2%, so ATC paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, ATC or MSR?
With every distribution reinvested, ATC returned +14.8% and MSR −33.6% over the year to Sep 30, 2026.
Which is cheaper, ATC or MSR?
ATC charges 1.07% a year and MSR charges 1.07%, so ATC is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, ATC against MSR, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/atc-vs-msr

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.