Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
ACRT vs IWMI: Dividend Yield & Total Return
ACRT and IWMI both write options for income.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about ACRT and IWMI
Net assets: $1.5m on Nov 4, 2026 for ProShares Russell 2000 Autocallable Income ETF, and $1.3bn on Oct 28, 2026 for NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF.
About even with IWM
ACRT since launch: paid 3.4%, price −10.7%, total −7.2%, IWM −6.7%, −0.5 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
IWM
−6.7%
ACRT
−7.2%
about even with IWM
Total return, distributions reinvested
About even with IWM
ACRT since launch: paid 3.4%, price −10.7%, total −7.2%, IWM −6.7%, −0.5 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
IWM
−6.7%
ACRT
−7.2%
about even with IWM
3.4% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACRT since launch: paid 3.4%, price −10.7%, total −7.2%, IWM −6.7%, −0.5 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.About even with IWM
IWMI over 1 year: paid 15.0%, price +2.8%, total +18.6%, IWM +19.0%, −0.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
IWM
+19.0%
IWMI
+18.6%
15.0% of it arrived as cash
about even with IWM
Total return, distributions reinvested
About even with IWM
IWMI over 1 year: paid 15.0%, price +2.8%, total +18.6%, IWM +19.0%, −0.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
IWM
+19.0%
IWMI
+18.6%
15.0% cash
about even with IWM
15.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. IWMI over 1 year: paid 15.0%, price +2.8%, total +18.6%, IWM +19.0%, −0.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
IWMI costs 0.04 points a year less; IWMI is far larger, $1.3bn against $1.5m.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | ACRT | IWMI |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | not published | +18.6% |
| Price change | fell 10.7% (since Aug 14, 2026) | rose 2.8% (1 year) |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 83% of the Nov 6, 2026 payment | 76% of the Oct 23, 2026 payment |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | Russell 2000, measured through IWM | Russell 2000, measured through IWM |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.72% | 0.68% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 28, 2026 | $1.5m | $1.3bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, ACRT and IWMI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ACRT | IWMI | ACRT | IWMI | ACRT | IWMI |
| 3 months | – | −3.0% | – | 3.4% | – | +2.0 pts |
| 6 months | – | +1.9% | – | 7.0% | – | +2.3 pts |
| 1 year | – | +18.6% | – | 15.0% | – | −0.3 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: ACRT Aug 2026 · IWMI Jun 2024 | −7.2% | +40.5% | 3.4% | 34.4% | −0.6 pts | −4.6 pts |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
ACRT
Over the period from its first trade on Aug 14, 2026 to Nov 4, 2026, ACRT paid 3.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 10.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −7.2%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned −6.7% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 16.4%, paid periodically. ProShares estimates that 83% of the distribution paid Nov 6, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
IWMI
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, IWMI paid 15.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.6%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned +19.0% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.9%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 76% of the distribution paid Oct 23, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ACRT against IWMI, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-iwmi
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). ACRT against IWMI. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-iwmi
[ACRT against IWMI (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acrt-vs-iwmi)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.