FSOL vs SOLC: which tracked its coin?
Over the window both share, FSOL finished 2.5 percentage points behind Solana and SOLC 1.9 behind. Fidelity Solana Fund and Canary Marinade Solana ETF.
FSOL since launch: fund −13.95%, Solana −16.07%, 2.12 pts ahead of Solana.
SOLC since launch: fund −13.29%, Solana −16.07%, 2.78 pts ahead of Solana.
A percentile among the 25 spot crypto ETPs listed less than a year. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All crypto ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →
The same coin, two trusts
FSOL and SOLC hold the same asset. Both are 1933 Act trusts holding Solana through a custodian, so neither has a portfolio to compare: the whole of each fund is one line. Over the same days, FSOL finished 2.1 percentage points ahead of Solana and SOLC 2.8 percentage points ahead, so FSOL kept more of what holding the coin gave, by 0.66 of a percentage point. That gap is the fee, the custody, the creation and redemption friction and the market’s pricing of the shares, compounded into one figure.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | The coin over the same days | Difference, percentage points | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | FSOL | SOLC | FSOL | SOLC | FSOL | SOLC |
| 1 month | +13.5% | +13.3% | +14.6% | +14.6% | −1.1 pts | −1.3 pts |
| 3 months | +54.0% | +54.3% | +52.6% | +52.6% | +1.4 pts | +1.7 pts |
| 6 months | +42.9% | +43.5% | +45.4% | +45.4% | −2.5 pts | −1.9 pts |
| Since each listed FSOL Nov 2025 · SOLC Nov 2025 | −13.9% | −13.3% | −16.1% | −16.1% | +2.1 pts | +2.8 pts |
FSOL and SOLC over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
FSOL and SOLC on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FSOL in plain words
FSOL holds Solana through a custodian and trades on an exchange, so a holder gets the coin’s return inside a brokerage account rather than a wallet. Over the time since it listed to Sep 30, 2026, Solana moved −16.1% and FSOL returned −13.9%. That leaves it 2.1 percentage points ahead. That difference is the fee, the custody cost, the friction of creating and redeeming shares in blocks, and whatever the market paid for the shares rather than for the coin, all of it together. It is the only figure on this page the sponsor does not publish itself. FSOL charges 0.25% a year and finished 2.1% ahead of Solana, which a fee cannot do on its own. Solana is a proof of stake chain, so a fund holding it can stake. FSOL’s own filings say it does (424B3, Aug 21, 2026). What the prices show is that it finished 2.1% ahead of Solana’s own price over the same days, against +3.4% for the other 7 funds holding Solana. After a fee, an in-kind ETP ahead of the asset it holds got there by staking. A spot trust is not a registered investment company. It files a 10-K rather than an N-PORT, and its holding is one line: the Solana it custodies.
SOLC in plain words
SOLC holds Solana through a custodian and trades on an exchange, so a holder gets the coin’s return inside a brokerage account rather than a wallet. Over the time since it listed to Sep 30, 2026, Solana moved −16.1% and SOLC returned −13.3%. That leaves it 2.8 percentage points ahead. SOLC charges 0.50% a year and finished 2.8% ahead of Solana, which a fee cannot do on its own. SOLC’s own filings say it does (10-Q, Aug 7, 2026). What the prices show is that it finished 2.8% ahead of Solana’s own price over the same days, against +3.4% for the other 7 funds holding Solana.
Questions people ask
- Which tracked Solana more closely, FSOL or SOLC?
- Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, FSOL finished 2.1 percentage points ahead of Solana and SOLC 2.8 percentage points ahead, so FSOL tracked it more closely, by 0.66 of a percentage point. That difference is the fee, the custody cost, the friction of creating and redeeming shares in blocks and whatever the market paid for the shares rather than for the coin, all together.
- Do FSOL or SOLC pay a staking yield?
- Solana is a proof of stake chain, so staking is possible. Whether either trust stakes, and what the sponsor keeps of it, is a term in its own filings and is read from those rather than assumed.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, FSOL against SOLC, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/crypto/fsol-vs-solc
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FSOL against SOLC, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/crypto/fsol-vs-solc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, FSOL against SOLC, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/crypto/fsol-vs-solc
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). FSOL against SOLC. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/crypto/fsol-vs-solc
- Markdown
- [FSOL against SOLC (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/crypto/fsol-vs-solc)