Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

ILF vs MBB: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, ILF returned +17.2% to MBB's −0.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about ILF and MBB

Net assets on Oct 28, 2026: $3.5bn for iShares Latin America 40 ETF and $35.5bn for iShares MBS ETF.

At a glance
+17.2%
ILF total return, 1 year
−0.8%
MBB total return, 1 year
0.47%
ILF expense ratio
0.04%
MBB expense ratio

Pair scorecard

MBB costs 0.43 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 18.0 points; MBB is 10.1 times larger.

ILF vs MBB: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureILFMBB
Return
Total return, 1 year+17.2%−0.8%
Drawdown
Below its high13.7%, high on Oct 12, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksS&P Latin America 40Bloomberg U.S. MBS Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.47%0.04%
Net assets$3.5bn$35.5bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund55.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, ILF and MBB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first ILF MBB
Only in one fund ↓
Only in ILF
NU HOLDINGS CLASS A 7.53%
PETROLEO BRASILEIRO ADR REPTG PRE 6.95%
ITAU UNIBANCO HOLDING ADR REP PRE 6.61%
PETROLEO BRASILEIRO ADR REPTG SA 6.61%
VALE ADR REPRESENTING ONE 6.45%
GRUPO MEXICO B 6.26%
GPO FINANCE BANORTE 4.48%
CREDICORP LTD 3.96%
Only in MBB
BLACKROCK CASH CL INST SL AGENCY 5.45%
FHLMC 30YR UMBS SUPER 1.05%
UMBS 30YR TBA(REG A) 0.60%
GNMA2 30YR 0.59%
GNMA2 30YR 0.54%
FNMA 30YR UMBS 0.53%
GNMA2 30YR 0.53%
GNMA2 30YR 0.52%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

ILF iShares Latin America 40 ETF MBB iShares MBS ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Bond ETF
What it is Tracks an index of Latin America 40 Tracks an index of mortgage-backed securities
Total return, 1 year +17.2% −0.8%
Its benchmark over the same days not measured −1.1% (SPMB)
Gap to its benchmark not measured +0.3 pts vs SPMB
Expense ratio 0.47% 0.04%
Holdings 46 10813
Net assets $3.5bn $35.5bn

ILF and MBB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

ILF and MBB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
ILF

ILF tracks an index of Latin America 40. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.47% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 46 positions, with the top ten at 55.6%. It sat 13.7% below its high of Oct 12, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

MBB

MBB tracks an index of mortgage-backed securities. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −0.8% with distributions reinvested, against −1.1% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. MBS Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ILF or MBB?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ILF returned +17.2% and MBB −0.8%.
Which is cheaper, ILF or MBB?
MBB is cheaper, by 0.43 percentage points a year. That is about $43 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ILF against MBB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ilf-vs-mbb

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.